2005
DOI: 10.5194/angeo-23-809-2005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling of the Jovian Magnetosphere

Abstract: Abstract. This paper presents a global model of the Jovian magnetosphere which is valid not only in the equatorial plane and near the planet, as most of the existing models are, but also at high latitudes and in the outer regions of the magnetosphere. The model includes the Jovian dipole, magnetodisc, and tail current system. The tail currents are combined with the magnetopause closure currents. All inner magnetospheric magnetic field sources are screened by the magnetopause currents. It guarantees a zero norm… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
95
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 79 publications
(101 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
2
95
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The ring current parameters are similar to those derived by Connerney et al (1983) using Voyager1 data, for which R ss ≈23-24 R s , while the distance of the inner edge of the tail current is determined from the typical ratio R 2 /R ss ≈0.8 (e.g. Alexeev et al, 2003Alexeev et al, , 2006Alexeev and Belenkaya, 2005;Belenkaya et al, 2006b). These kronian parameter sets are summarized in Table 1 (the dipole tilt angle being ≈25 • in all cases).…”
Section: Selection Of the Input Model Parameterssupporting
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The ring current parameters are similar to those derived by Connerney et al (1983) using Voyager1 data, for which R ss ≈23-24 R s , while the distance of the inner edge of the tail current is determined from the typical ratio R 2 /R ss ≈0.8 (e.g. Alexeev et al, 2003Alexeev et al, , 2006Alexeev and Belenkaya, 2005;Belenkaya et al, 2006b). These kronian parameter sets are summarized in Table 1 (the dipole tilt angle being ≈25 • in all cases).…”
Section: Selection Of the Input Model Parameterssupporting
confidence: 81%
“…Alexeev et al, 2003;Belenkaya, 2004;Alexeev and Belenkaya, 2005). The mag- netopause is taken to be a paraboloid of revolution about the Saturn-Sun line, given in KSM coordinates by where R ss is again the sub-solar distance of the magnetopause.…”
Section: Selection Of the Input Model Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For simplicity the current sheets in the model are taken to be of zero thickness, compared with observed thicknesses typically of a few R S (e.g., Kellett et al, 2009), which should have little effect on the field line mapping between ionosphere and magnetosphere. Further discussion of the paraboloid model current systems and magnetic fields may be found, e.g., in Alexeev and Belenkaya (2005). The effect of the IMF inside the magnetosphere is given by adding the uniform field k S B IMF , where B IMF is the IMF vector and 0 ≤ k S ≤ 1 is the magnetosphere penetration coefficient.…”
Section: Paraboloid Model Calculationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Grodent et al (2003), Pallier and Prangé (2001), and Vogt et al (2011) suggested that the so-called auroral "swirl" region coincides with the region of open ionospheric flux, which observations show to occupy approximately one-third of the area inside Jupiter's main oval. This interpretation was supported by the calculations of Belenkaya et al (2006a) using the paraboloid model of Jupiter's magnetospheric magnetic field (see Alexeev and Belenkaya, 2005, and references therein) with an interplanetary magnetic field (IMF) value ∼ 0.5 nT, which is characteristic of Jupiter's solar wind environment. The breakdown of Jupiter's magnetospheric plasma rotation in the equatorial magnetosphere creates strong upward field-aligned currents flowing from the ionosphere (Hill, 2001; to the inner region of Jupiter's magnetodisc located at the Alfvén radius (Alexeev and Belenkaya, 2005;Belenkaya and Khodachenko, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 75%