2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.str.2022.04.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling of protein conformational changes with Rosetta guided by limited experimental data

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 89 publications
(84 reference statements)
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These distance distributions directly provide information on protein tertiary and quaternary structure. Coupled with high-resolution structural techniques, SDSL EPR provides insight into protein conformational landscapes and how they change in response to different stimuli [16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27]. Accordingly, SDSL EPR is particularly useful for validation and refinement of protein structural models as well as expansion of these models to include conformational heterogeneity and distinct alternate conformational states.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These distance distributions directly provide information on protein tertiary and quaternary structure. Coupled with high-resolution structural techniques, SDSL EPR provides insight into protein conformational landscapes and how they change in response to different stimuli [16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27]. Accordingly, SDSL EPR is particularly useful for validation and refinement of protein structural models as well as expansion of these models to include conformational heterogeneity and distinct alternate conformational states.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, a structure-based, machine learning algorithm was successfully used to obtain the FAST-PETase, which was a mutation of PETase and exhibited superior PET-hydrolytic activity than wild-type and engineered alternatives at 30–50°C ( Lu et al, 2022 ). Similarly, machine learning methods such as AlphaFold2 ( Varadi et al, 2022 ), ProBound ( Rube et al, 2022 ), RoseTTAFold ( Sala et al, 2022 ), showed great potential in deciphering structure–function relationship and in precisely guiding protein engineering.…”
Section: Bottlenecks and Challenges Of Recycling Plasticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[21][22][23][24] DEER distance distributions can also refine distorted protein conformations by searching conformations that have similar theoretical and experimental distance distributions. [25][26][27][28][29][30] DEER distance distributions have been used for positioning R1 side chains through multilateration [31][32][33] and been proposed as distance restraints for modeling protein structures, similar to the distance restraints obtained by NMR spectroscopy. 23,25,27,29,31,33 In the combination of alternative states predicted by AlphaFold2, a machine learning model for structural prediction, DEER data have been proposed to have the ability to sample alternative conformational states.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[25][26][27][28][29][30] DEER distance distributions have been used for positioning R1 side chains through multilateration [31][32][33] and been proposed as distance restraints for modeling protein structures, similar to the distance restraints obtained by NMR spectroscopy. 23,25,27,29,31,33 In the combination of alternative states predicted by AlphaFold2, a machine learning model for structural prediction, DEER data have been proposed to have the ability to sample alternative conformational states. 34,35 Despite these extensive applications, the DEER technique has not been applied to model a threedimensional structure with high precision.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%