2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.solener.2017.08.046
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling of photovoltaic soiling loss as a function of environmental variables

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
69
0
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 144 publications
(72 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
1
69
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Soiling is the result of the interaction of a number of environmental factors [6][7][8][9][10][11][12]. Typically, the soiling of a PV system is monitored by using soiling stations, where the electrical output of a soiled PV device (soiled device) is compared with the output of the PV device under clean conditions (control device).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Soiling is the result of the interaction of a number of environmental factors [6][7][8][9][10][11][12]. Typically, the soiling of a PV system is monitored by using soiling stations, where the electrical output of a soiled PV device (soiled device) is compared with the output of the PV device under clean conditions (control device).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results shown in this work are purely statistical, so it should not necessarily be assumed that these parameters have no physical impact on soiling. Indeed, soiling is also known to depend on parameters such as relative humidity, wind speed, and tilt angle, which have not shown any statistical significance in this work. The results of this analysis might be due to a number of reasons.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…Indeed, as shown in Table and Table , the way that data are handled can strongly impact their ability to predict soiling. Fourth, some parameters may have a higher impact on the daily or seasonal trends of soiling, whereas having only limited effect on its annual average value, as already pointed out in Micheli et al and Javed et al…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 85%
See 2 more Smart Citations