2000
DOI: 10.1007/s00585-000-0047-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling of occurrence frequencies of ion conics as a function of altitude and conic angle

Abstract: Abstract. The occurrence frequencies of dayside ion conics with various conic angles are obtained as a function of altitude from Exos-D (Akebono) observations. We made a model calculation of ion conic evolution to match the observation results. The observed occurrence frequencies of ion conics with 80 to 90 conic angle are used as an input to the model and the occurrence frequencies of ion conics with smaller conic angles are numerically calculated at higher altitudes. The calculated occurrence frequencies are… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

2
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…conics contain all the conics with a conic angle larger than 60 deg. The occurrence of conics with a conic angle larger than 80 deg has a peak around an altitude of 5000-6000 km and is decreased with altitude (Miyake et al, 2000a). Therefore, the intensity of LEFs around an altitude of 5000-6000 km is close to that associated with perpendicular conics, while the intensity of LEFs around 9000-10000 km is close to that associated with 60-deg conics.…”
Section: Correlation Between Lefs and Ion Conicsmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…conics contain all the conics with a conic angle larger than 60 deg. The occurrence of conics with a conic angle larger than 80 deg has a peak around an altitude of 5000-6000 km and is decreased with altitude (Miyake et al, 2000a). Therefore, the intensity of LEFs around an altitude of 5000-6000 km is close to that associated with perpendicular conics, while the intensity of LEFs around 9000-10000 km is close to that associated with 60-deg conics.…”
Section: Correlation Between Lefs and Ion Conicsmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…in an altitude range of 2500-6000 km from 0900 to 1500 MLT [Miyake et al, 2000], the start altitude was estimated on the basis of the altitude where the pitch angle becomes 120 , which is 1100-1500 km higher than the altitude of the estimated mirror point (1900-2030 UT), and v k at the altitude. The lower limit of the start altitude (h s ) in Table 1 is calculated assuming a constant v k during the transit time.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although ion acceleration in the cusp/cleft is not clear, we performed a very rough estimation on the basis of Case 2 and the transit time of 4.5 min (v conv = 750 m/s). Since the typical cone angle of ion conics is >60 in an altitude range of 2500-6000 km from 0900 to 1500 MLT [Miyake et al, 2000], the start altitude was estimated on the basis of the altitude where the pitch angle becomes 120 , which is 1100-1500 km higher than the altitude of the estimated mirror point (1900( -2030, and v k at the altitude. The lower limit of the start altitude (h s ) in Table 1 is calculated assuming a constant v k during the transit time.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%