2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.ces.2016.05.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling of non-Darcy flow through anisotropic porous media: Role of pore space profiles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To further establish whether equation (2) suitably describes real geologic porous media representing different processes inducing pore geometry variation, we focused on the results from groups of previous laboratory experiments where geologic samples were deformed through compression (Dan et al, 2016;Gostick et al, 2006;Jones, 1987;Ma et al, 2015;Ma et al, 2016;Schrauf & Evans, 1986;Zhou et al, 2015), torsion (Okumura et al, 2009), shearing (Javadi et al, 2014;Wang, 2017), or decompression (Lindoo et al, 2016;Takeuchi et al, 2009), and from modeling experiments where pore networks with ducts of different shapes were systematically varied (Veyskarami et al, 2016), like we did with our CFD simulations discussed below. The complete details on the data set including the type of geologic porous media, the geometry-varying processes represented, and the fitted parameters are provided in Table S4 in the supporting information.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To further establish whether equation (2) suitably describes real geologic porous media representing different processes inducing pore geometry variation, we focused on the results from groups of previous laboratory experiments where geologic samples were deformed through compression (Dan et al, 2016;Gostick et al, 2006;Jones, 1987;Ma et al, 2015;Ma et al, 2016;Schrauf & Evans, 1986;Zhou et al, 2015), torsion (Okumura et al, 2009), shearing (Javadi et al, 2014;Wang, 2017), or decompression (Lindoo et al, 2016;Takeuchi et al, 2009), and from modeling experiments where pore networks with ducts of different shapes were systematically varied (Veyskarami et al, 2016), like we did with our CFD simulations discussed below. The complete details on the data set including the type of geologic porous media, the geometry-varying processes represented, and the fitted parameters are provided in Table S4 in the supporting information.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the CFD modeling, we first investigated an idealized pore geometry with sinusoidal walls in an axissymmetric framework (Figure 3a), following previous investigations where basic pore configurations were adopted to reveal the underlying physical mechanism for complex flow and transport phenomena (Bolster et al, 2014;Veyskarami et al, 2016). The pore geometry can be fully characterized by two dimensionless numbers, the aspect ratio (L/R t ) and fluctuation (R b /R t ), where L is the longitudinal length of the pore and R t and R b are the radii at the pore throat and pore body, respectively.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various origins of the deviation were mentioned in a heuristic way in the literature. Among them, one can mention pore roughness [42,43], loss of kinetic energy in restrictions and constrictions [44], development of inertial cores [9,45], bends in the flow paths [46], formation of a hydrodynamic boundary layer [15], change in spatial distribution of the kinetic energy within the structure [47], flow tortuosity [48], and pore-throat curvature [49]. Some authors distinguished contributions due to linear losses in pores and channels and quadratic losses in contractions and expansions [50].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then the REV determined by nonDarcy coefficient and the REV determined by inherent permeability should be consistent, but more studies have shown that the non-Darcy coefficient is not only related to the intrinsic permeability of media. Evans and Civan [52], Geertsma [53], and Macdonald et al [54] found that nonDarcy coefficient is also related to the effective porosity of the pore medium; Li and Engler [55] and Veyskarami et al [56] proposed that, for isotropic media, several correlations relate to petrophysical parameters (in particular , k, and the tortuosity ); Knupp and Lage [57] also pointed out that is related to the inherent permeability and inertia coefficient , where represents the microform resistance exerted by the solid porous substrate; that is to say, it depends on the geometry of the solids in each basic representative volume of the porous medium. It is noteworthy that and are independent parameters.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%