2020
DOI: 10.1007/s12665-020-09170-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling of methane migration from gas wellbores into shallow groundwater at basin scale

Abstract: Methane contamination of drinking water resources is one of the major concerns associated with unconventional gas development. This study assesses the potential contamination of shallow groundwater via methane migration from a leaky natural gas well through overburden rocks, following hydraulic fracturing. A two-dimensional, two-phase, two-component numerical model is employed to simulate methane and brine upward migration toward shallow groundwater in a generic sedimentary basin. A sensitivity analysis is con… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, with the program code being generally available, modifications can easily be made, and the source code can be adapted to specific non-standard problems. For single-phase transport problems, COMSOL represents a good choice for a simulator; however, for more complex physics (e.g., multi-phase flow [43,44], hydromechanical coupling [6,45], etc. ), further benchmarking studies need to be conducted to test the efficiency of these simulators.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, with the program code being generally available, modifications can easily be made, and the source code can be adapted to specific non-standard problems. For single-phase transport problems, COMSOL represents a good choice for a simulator; however, for more complex physics (e.g., multi-phase flow [43,44], hydromechanical coupling [6,45], etc. ), further benchmarking studies need to be conducted to test the efficiency of these simulators.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Distance to the nearest UOG well, IDW, and ID 2 W metrics was constructed using the Euclidean distance between each participant’s home and surrounding eligible UOG wells within 2, 5, and 10 km (ArcGIS 10.8.1). We selected these buffer sizes based on the hydrogeologic literature, which generally supports transport distances of 2 km or less and the epidemiologic literature, which incorporates buffer distances up to 10 km . For ID ups , which was specific to the groundwater exposure pathway, we explored buffer sizes of 0.2, 0.3, 0.5, 1, and 2 km. , Additionally, ID ups buffers are applied around delineated flow paths from UOG well locations and not around participant homes.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to [32][33][34][35][36], it can be known that pore water saturation should be a function of temperature and matrix suction, which has the following relationship:…”
Section: Coupled Governing Equations For Unsaturated Soilsmentioning
confidence: 99%