2016 IEEE International Conference on Electron Devices and Solid-State Circuits (EDSSC) 2016
DOI: 10.1109/edssc.2016.7785299
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling of kink-effect in RF behaviour of GaN HEMTs using ASM-HEMT model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With the aim of enabling microwave engineers to exploit advanced transistor technologies at their best, increasing attention is being given to the investigation of the kink effects in the output reflection coefficient (S 22 ) and the short-circuit current-gain (h 21 ) of solid-state electronic devices made with different semiconductor materials, like silicon (Si), gallium arsenide (GaAs), and gallium nitride (GaN) [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13]. The kink in S 22 consists in the change of the concavity of the function Im(S 22 ) versus Re(S 22 ) (i.e., from convex to concave and vice versa), while the kinks in h 21 consist of peaks that are detectable by plotting the magnitude of h 21 in dB versus the frequency on a log scale.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the aim of enabling microwave engineers to exploit advanced transistor technologies at their best, increasing attention is being given to the investigation of the kink effects in the output reflection coefficient (S 22 ) and the short-circuit current-gain (h 21 ) of solid-state electronic devices made with different semiconductor materials, like silicon (Si), gallium arsenide (GaAs), and gallium nitride (GaN) [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13]. The kink in S 22 consists in the change of the concavity of the function Im(S 22 ) versus Re(S 22 ) (i.e., from convex to concave and vice versa), while the kinks in h 21 consist of peaks that are detectable by plotting the magnitude of h 21 in dB versus the frequency on a log scale.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…And a high g m has been usually found to be mainly responsible for this phenomenon. In line with this theory, GaN HEMTs, especially for those with larger gate width, tend to show prominence of the kink effect in S 22 , since they inherently exhibit high g m suitable for high power applications …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…In line with this theory, GaN HEMTs, especially for those with larger gate width, tend to show prominence of the kink effect in S 22 , since they inherently exhibit high g m suitable for high power applications. [33][34][35] To further assess the soundness of the model parameter extraction method, the scalability of the intrinsic Yparameters for the 4 × 75 μm and 4 × 200 μm devices is investigated. In general, when the model parasitic elements are well identified, the intrinsic Y-parameters of the device would scale linearly with periphery.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to increase attention for high‐temperature and high‐power applications at high frequencies, the kink effects are investigated in the output reflection coefficient (S 22 ) and the short‐circuit current gain (h 21 ) to be shown how these phenomena affect the applications of electronic devices . At first, the S parameters are analyzed completely that S 11 and S 22 on Smith charts and S 21 and S 12 on polar plots are reported .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%