2012
DOI: 10.1029/2011ja017475
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling of ionospheric magnetic field perturbations induced by earthquakes

Abstract: [1] The objective of this study is to present a simple coupled seismo-ionospheric model to account for magnetic field perturbations in response to geophysical phenomena such as Earthquakes or tsunamis. For this purpose, we include a simple gravity wave model in the two dimensional mid latitude ionosphere model SAMI2. Following an earthquake, the disturbances in the neutral atmosphere density and velocity associated with gravity waves propagate vertically upward up to ionospheric altitudes 150-350 km, where sig… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…More directive sources, yielding waves with approximately planar phase fronts, may produce TEC responses with a different character [e.g., Imtiaz and Marchand, 2012]. Electron density fluctuations in the source hemisphere are 10% and large enough to be observable via high time and range resolution incoherent scatter radar experiments [e.g., Djuth et al, 2010]; no significant electron signatures are present in the conjugate hemispheres.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More directive sources, yielding waves with approximately planar phase fronts, may produce TEC responses with a different character [e.g., Imtiaz and Marchand, 2012]. Electron density fluctuations in the source hemisphere are 10% and large enough to be observable via high time and range resolution incoherent scatter radar experiments [e.g., Djuth et al, 2010]; no significant electron signatures are present in the conjugate hemispheres.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…So far, models on coupling energy from Earth's surface vibrations to the ionosphere have been established to confirm the interaction among spheres and simulate both seismo‐induced neutral atmospheric waves and therefore ionospheric variations [ Artru et al ., , ; Watada et al ., ; Rolland et al ., ]. Recently, Imtiaz and Marchand [] present a model to account for magnetic field perturbation, when given an acoustic impulse in the atmosphere. But no model has been completed so far to simulate the whole coupling system, from seismic waves to the magnetic disturbances.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…AGWs generate dynamo electrical currents and, hence, magnetic perturbations, as they propagate through conducting ionospheric plasma layers at ∼100–300‐km altitude (e.g., Hao et al, ; Zettergren & Snively, , ). Simulations of magnetic fluctuations due to seismic sources predict detectable fluctuations at AGW frequencies at ground‐level (Kherani et al, ) and in the ionosphere (Imtiaz & Marchand, ). Detailed simulations by Zettergren and Snively () found ground‐level signatures ∼0.1–2 nT in amplitude and in situ signatures are ∼1–10 nT, which match the approximate characteristics of observations; however, simplified sources and two‐dimensional (2‐D) models were used that do not fully capture the geometry of wave‐driven currents.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%