2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.ultras.2006.07.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling of interaction between therapeutic ultrasound propagation and cavitation bubbles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

4
13
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
4
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This may be due to the effect of tensile wave shortening from the cavitation that is produced by the tensile portion. [32][33][34][35] Since the computation does not include cavitation, this effect is not modeled and the numerical result contains the full non-attenuated tensile portion. Figure 7 shows that the distribution of peak pressures in the focal plane for 13.8 and 15.8 kV input is well captured by the model except for an approximate 10% difference in P þ near the focus.…”
Section: A Validation Using Original Lensmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This may be due to the effect of tensile wave shortening from the cavitation that is produced by the tensile portion. [32][33][34][35] Since the computation does not include cavitation, this effect is not modeled and the numerical result contains the full non-attenuated tensile portion. Figure 7 shows that the distribution of peak pressures in the focal plane for 13.8 and 15.8 kV input is well captured by the model except for an approximate 10% difference in P þ near the focus.…”
Section: A Validation Using Original Lensmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…30 to 3 · 10 5 per ml).The work has been stimulated by the findings that the life-time of cavitation bubbles increases with higher bubble densities [11][12][13] . The analysis presented in this paper might be relevant to the field of shock wave lithotripsy where recent numerical works 11,15 emphasize the effect of nuclei concentration on the cluster dynamics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Clinical experience has demonstrated that the treatment outcome of SWL depends critically on the design features and operating conditions of a lithotripter, with much emphasis given to the pulserepetition frequency (PRF) [3][4][5][6][7]. Even a slight increase in the PRF from 1 to 2 Hz is shown to significantly decrease the effectiveness of treatment [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When bubble proliferation occurs in the beam path, the tensile component of the lithotripter pulse is attenuated due to loss of the tensile wave energy to expanding cavitation bubbles [1,5,9]. This tensile attenuation has been shown to depend on the density of cavitation nuclei in the beam path and is sensitive to the PRF [17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%