2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrysgro.2004.10.087
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling of industrial bulk crystal growth—state of the art and challenges

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Simulation models mainly focused on predicting thermal field distribution of the system for equipment design. Such models were typically based on partial differential equations (PDE) describing the growth dynamics (Derby and Brown, 1986;Fischer et al, 2005). Müller (2002) proposed the concept of reverse simulation, which aimed at controlling a certain kind of defect given the defect-process relationships.…”
Section: State-of-the-artmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Simulation models mainly focused on predicting thermal field distribution of the system for equipment design. Such models were typically based on partial differential equations (PDE) describing the growth dynamics (Derby and Brown, 1986;Fischer et al, 2005). Müller (2002) proposed the concept of reverse simulation, which aimed at controlling a certain kind of defect given the defect-process relationships.…”
Section: State-of-the-artmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, dopant segregation and thermal stress on solidification are directly linked to the convective mass and heat transport in the melt, and their prediction and control is still one of the major challenges in crystal growth. Numerical modeling is ascribed a key role in predicting the melt flow and related phenomena [2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of global modeling is nowadays standard in the development of bulk growth processes [2]. Especially in the growth of compound semiconductors, the reduction of the dislocation density is one of the primary goals of process optimization.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%