2011
DOI: 10.1177/1045389x11414223
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling of Hysteresis and Backlash for a Smart Fin with a Piezoelectric Actuator

Abstract: This work presents a dynamic model of a smart fin that is activated by a piezoelectric bimorph actuator, which is made by bonding two MFCs. The actuator is completely enclosed within the fin. Earlier research has indicated that the use of a linear model for the fin dynamics does not fully describe the fin. This work presents a more realistic approach to this problem by incorporating additional components into the model. Therefore, a proportional damping matrix is introduced. It is also observed that experiment… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
(44 reference statements)
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The nonlinearity caused by hysteresis yielded to inaccurate positioning behavior; hence, it is a major disadvantage of the system. There are many approaches by numerical methods and experimental tools developed to describe the hysteresis nonlinearity phenomena within PEAs [15,22,[24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31]. In their review, Aridogan and Basdogan [32] and Zuo and Wong [33] focused on the active vibration and noise control systems utilizing piezoelectric patches as sensors and actuators, while Peng and Chen [34] reviewed the various methods for modeling linear and nonlinear behaviors of PEAs.…”
Section: Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The nonlinearity caused by hysteresis yielded to inaccurate positioning behavior; hence, it is a major disadvantage of the system. There are many approaches by numerical methods and experimental tools developed to describe the hysteresis nonlinearity phenomena within PEAs [15,22,[24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31]. In their review, Aridogan and Basdogan [32] and Zuo and Wong [33] focused on the active vibration and noise control systems utilizing piezoelectric patches as sensors and actuators, while Peng and Chen [34] reviewed the various methods for modeling linear and nonlinear behaviors of PEAs.…”
Section: Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They attributed the reason to not considering the hysteresis compensation of MFCs in the control system design. Trabia et al [8] studied the small morphing wing deflected by the MFC bimorph, and found that the controller based on the actuator linear model can meet the requirements for tracking constant or slowly changing displacement commands; however, the hysteresis nonlinearity of the actuator must be considered in the controller design for the rapidly changing displacement commands. Thus, the hysteresis of MFC actuators can seriously affect the accuracy of the flight control system of MAVs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their experimental results indicated that the response of the actuator experienced saturation and asymmetry, which were the results of hysteresis and backlash. Due to the added complexity associated with modeling hysteresis and backlash in PZT actuators, several researchers [8][9][10] used different optimization techniques to model these nonlinear effects. Recently, a compensation strategy for the asymmetric hysteresis that used two models, connected in series, for symmetric and asymmetric hysteresis, was proposed [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%