2004
DOI: 10.1021/ie049618y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling of Hydrodesulfurization Catalysts. I. Influence of Catalyst Pore Structures on the Rate of Demetallization

Abstract: A mathematical model to describe catalyst deactivation during residuum hydrodesulfurization (HDS) has been applied to catalyst systems of different pore structures. Simulations were carried out on the hydrodemetallization (HDM) reaction, which usually leads to the steady accumulation of metals during HDS. Catalyst activity decays with time both linearly and nonlinearly depending on the pore structure. Predicted lifetimes for three different pore structures show that the catalyst can deactivate within 5−15 mont… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…All the major assumptions made have been presented elsewhere [11,12]. The heterogeneous catalyst system was Nomenclature C instantaneous concentration of reactant C M instantaneous concentration of reactant for the macropore system C 0 initial concentration of reactant for the random pore system (kmol/m 3 ) C 0 M initial concentration of reactant for the macropore pore system (kmol/m 3 ) D bulk diffusivity D e effective diffusivity D em effective diffusivity for the micropore system D eM effective diffusivity for the macropore system D m bulk diffusivity for the micropore system D M bulk diffusivity for the macropore system D rM restricted diffusivity for the macropore system E m microregion void fraction E M macroregion void fraction K reaction rate constant per unit surface area K M deposition velocity defined by Eq.…”
Section: Main Assumptionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…All the major assumptions made have been presented elsewhere [11,12]. The heterogeneous catalyst system was Nomenclature C instantaneous concentration of reactant C M instantaneous concentration of reactant for the macropore system C 0 initial concentration of reactant for the random pore system (kmol/m 3 ) C 0 M initial concentration of reactant for the macropore pore system (kmol/m 3 ) D bulk diffusivity D e effective diffusivity D em effective diffusivity for the micropore system D eM effective diffusivity for the macropore system D m bulk diffusivity for the micropore system D M bulk diffusivity for the macropore system D rM restricted diffusivity for the macropore system E m microregion void fraction E M macroregion void fraction K reaction rate constant per unit surface area K M deposition velocity defined by Eq.…”
Section: Main Assumptionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A procedure for incorporating pore size distribution in the macro and micropores for calculating effectiveness factor (h) and the reaction rate per unit volume of catalyst (R v ) for a second order reaction is available [9][10][11][12]:…”
Section: Effectiveness Factor and Reaction Ratementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Previous studies (Inoue et al, 1988;1991;Oyekunle and Ikpekri, 2004;Gong et al, 2005) have shown that a larger pore size and a greater number of pores promote the reactions by facilitating the transmission of heat and mass into and out of the catalyst. Moreover, it is well known that high porosity implies high surface area, which provides a large number of reactive sites.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%