Modeling of High Voltage Three-Phase Power Supply Using Five-Limb Magnetic Shunt Transformer

Oumghar, Rajaa; Chraygane, M.; Outzguinrimt, Hamid; Lahame, Mouhcine

doi:10.1109/iccsre.2019.8807486

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 5 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Minimum (or Maximum) bounds are imposed on the design variables. This subsection describes the method for the optimal design of a three-phase shell-type distribution MFLT using the method of sequential programming (SQP) [20][21][22][23][24][25]. The use of this method is successful in optimization of dimensioning and shape optimizatio n. This algorithm is powerful and effective in the nonlinear programming, attempts to resolve the program directly instead of transforming it into a sequence problem of minimization without constraints, which makes this algorithm differs compared to other methods (method of optimization without constraints).…”

Section: Procedures For Optimizationmentioning

confidence: 99%

Optimal design of a three phase magnetic flux leakage transformer for industrial microwave generators

Outzguinrimt¹,

Chraygane²,

Lahame³

et al. 2020

Bulletin EEI

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This paper aims to get an optimal high voltage magnetic flux leakage transformer design of a three-phase shell type. Optimal design of transformer requires determination of design variables to optimize a particular objective and satisfying a set of constraints. The objective function is to minimize the total mass and reduce the volume of the transformer. This function depends on inputs, which are divided into optimization variables. Each optimization variable varies within a certain interval thus defining a global search space. It is within this space that we seek the optimal solution. The constraints: maximum and average current of magnetron anode are part of the problem in order to limit the overall search space. The results obtained indicate that the method has provided a global optimum. The computation time and cost of active material are much reduced compared with the conventional design results.

show abstract