Modeling of high temperature Hopkinson tests on AA5083 and Ti6Al4V

Berkovic, L.; Ryckaert, R.; Chabotier, A.; Gilson, L.; Coghe, F.; Rabet, L.

doi:10.1051/dymat/2009235

Cited by 2 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The SHPB apparatus consists of two long bars made of maraging steel, each having a length of 2 meter and a diameter of 3 centimeters [10]. A cylindrical sample of the material to be tested is put between the bars.…”

Section: The Split Hopkinson Pressure Bar (Shpb)mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Constitutive equations of a ballistic steel alloy as a function of temperature

Berkovic

Chabotier

Coghe

et al. 2012

EPJ Web of Conferences

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract. In the present work, dynamic tests have been performed on a new ballistic steel alloy by means of split Hopkinson pressure bars (SHPB). The impact behavior was investigated for strain rates ranging from 1000 to 2500 s −1 , and temperatures in the range from −196 to 300• C. A robotized sample device was developed for transferring the sample from the heating or cooling device to the position between the bars. Simulations of the temperature evolution and its distribution in the specimen were performed using the finite element method. Measurements with thermocouples added inside the sample were carried out in order to validate the FEM simulations. The results show that a thermal gradient is present inside the sample; the average temperature loss during the manipulation of the sample is evaluated. In a last stage, optimal material constants for different constitutive models (Johnson-Cook, Zerilli-Amstrong, Cowper-Symonds) has been computed by fitting, in a least square sense, the numerical and experimental stress-strain curves. They have been implemented in a hydrocode for validation using a simple impact problem: an adapted projectile geometry with a truncated nose (.50 calibre fragment simulating projectiles) was fired directly against an armor plate. The parameters of the selected strength and failure models were determined. There is a good correspondence between the experimental and computed results. Nevertheless, an improved failure model is necessary to get satisfactory computed residual projectile velocities.

show abstract

Section: The Split Hopkinson Pressure Bar (Shpb)mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…(Fig. 2) Because of the non-negligible delay between the positioning of the sample between the bars and the actual test, the evolution of the temperature of the sample during its manipulation was studied first using K-type thermocouples [10]. For this purpose, a hole was drilled in the middle of the sample.…”

Section: The Split Hopkinson Pressure Bar (Shpb)mentioning

confidence: 99%