1982
DOI: 10.1002/cjce.5450600112
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling of flow nonuniformities in fissured porous media

Abstract: A review is performed to.trace how fissured porous media arise in nature. It is fourid that packed beds resemble fissured porous media. The range of multiple flow time-scales inherent in such media becomes larger as the particle size range becomes broader, resulting in flow nonuniformities. The status of experimental measurements of voidage and flow nonuniformities is assessed. Some of the difficulties associated with modeling of the multiple flow time-scales are discussed, and a tentative model is proposed.ac… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1985
1985
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The inside diameter was chosen to reduce wall effects to a level consistent with the objectives of the experiment Wall effects have been investilgated by Schwartz and Smith (1953), Lyczkowski (1982), and Dybbs and Edwards (1986). Their inve.3tigations indicate that unless the column to bead diameter ratio J,sgreater than 30, there will be significant variations in flow velocities across the column.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The inside diameter was chosen to reduce wall effects to a level consistent with the objectives of the experiment Wall effects have been investilgated by Schwartz and Smith (1953), Lyczkowski (1982), and Dybbs and Edwards (1986). Their inve.3tigations indicate that unless the column to bead diameter ratio J,sgreater than 30, there will be significant variations in flow velocities across the column.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The experimental apparatus (see The length of the column was selected to red.uce apparatus induced dispersion since this effect is most significant in short columns 0ames and Rubin, 1972). The inside diameter was chosen to reduce wall effects to a level consistent with the objectives of the experiment Wall effects have been investilgated by Schwartz and Smith (1953), Lyczkowski (1982), and Dybbs and Edwards (1986). Their inve.3tigations indicate that unless the column to bead diameter ratio J,sgreater than 30, there will be significant variations in flow velocities across the column.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%