2016
DOI: 10.1149/2.0661610jes
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling of Concurrent CO2and Water Splitting by Practical Photoelectrochemical Devices

Abstract: Concurrent solar generation of hydrogen and CO through photoelectrochemical (PEC) water and CO 2 electrolysis, and the subsequent use of the product gas mixture in conventional Fischer-Tropsch processes, has the potential to provide a flexible pathway for direct solar generation of a variety of liquid fuels. In order for this approach to be practical, PEC devices must be designed to continuously and selectively provide a well-defined ratio of hydrogen to CO, independent of operating conditions. We develop a co… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These parameters are typically the most sensitive when fitting and facilitating agreement between the polarization curves or product distributions collected experimentally and those simulated through continuum modeling. Figure displays a distribution of Butler–Volmer kinetic parameters for electrochemical CO 2 reduction on various catalysts (Cu, Ag, Au, and Sn) employed in various continuum models of electrochemical CO 2 reduction; ,,,,,,,, the specific values used for these figures can be found in Table . When examining the fit parameters in these distributions, the spread in the fit values, even across a single catalyst, is quite large, even though some variation in these parameters is expected due to the drastically different experimental architectures and conditions (e.g., the choice of the electrolyte cation, which greatly impacts selectivity). , For instance, in the case of CO 2 reduction to ethanol on Cu, there is a variance in the fit exchange current densities of 25 orders of magnitude, and the transfer coefficients vary from 0.02 to 1.1.…”
Section: General Aspects and Equationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These parameters are typically the most sensitive when fitting and facilitating agreement between the polarization curves or product distributions collected experimentally and those simulated through continuum modeling. Figure displays a distribution of Butler–Volmer kinetic parameters for electrochemical CO 2 reduction on various catalysts (Cu, Ag, Au, and Sn) employed in various continuum models of electrochemical CO 2 reduction; ,,,,,,,, the specific values used for these figures can be found in Table . When examining the fit parameters in these distributions, the spread in the fit values, even across a single catalyst, is quite large, even though some variation in these parameters is expected due to the drastically different experimental architectures and conditions (e.g., the choice of the electrolyte cation, which greatly impacts selectivity). , For instance, in the case of CO 2 reduction to ethanol on Cu, there is a variance in the fit exchange current densities of 25 orders of magnitude, and the transfer coefficients vary from 0.02 to 1.1.…”
Section: General Aspects and Equationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, the optimal H 2 /CO ratio for syngas to generate hydrocarbons is 1.7 when using an iron-based catalyst and 2.15 when using a cobalt-based catalyst. 7,8…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the F–T process, the ratio of syngas is crucial to maximize the product yield. For instance, the optimal H 2 /CO ratio for syngas to generate hydrocarbons is 1.7 when using an iron-based catalyst and 2.15 when using a cobalt-based catalyst. , …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, it is worth noting that even in this case, hydrogen is still the main product. The complicated details of polarization losses and other cell dependent nonidealities have been modeled in detail for PEC-based CO 2 reducing cells. , …”
Section: Photoelectrochemical Co2 Reductionmentioning
confidence: 99%