2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.sbi.2012.03.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling nucleic acids

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
69
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 88 publications
(71 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
1
69
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Currently, there are multiple tools and computational approaches that can describe RNA structure at various levels of detail. [14][15][16] In an important series of works [17][18][19][20][21][22][23] the thermodynamics of RNA secondary structure (i.e., the list of base pairs in the folded state of RNA) was characterized in terms of a nearest-neighbor model for calculating the free energies of various secondary-structure motifs. The nearest-neighbor model is the basis of various tools for the prediction of the secondary structure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, there are multiple tools and computational approaches that can describe RNA structure at various levels of detail. [14][15][16] In an important series of works [17][18][19][20][21][22][23] the thermodynamics of RNA secondary structure (i.e., the list of base pairs in the folded state of RNA) was characterized in terms of a nearest-neighbor model for calculating the free energies of various secondary-structure motifs. The nearest-neighbor model is the basis of various tools for the prediction of the secondary structure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The traditional approach for determining point charges in the force field development, usually referred to as the ESP (electrostatic potential) method, 44 is to fit the point charges against the reference quantum mechanical (QM) MEP φ QM by minimizing the sum of squared residuals φ QM -φ PC calculated over the N point on a grid: (1) where φ PC is the potential produced by the point charges: (2) Examples of different implementations of this method include Merz-Kollman, 45,46 CHELP, 47 and CHELPG, 48 which mainly differ by the choice of the reference grid. These approaches typically employ Lagrange multipliers to impose a constraint on the overall molecular charge and, sometimes, on the molecular dipole moment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent developments have expanded the accuracy of CG methods, especially for B-DNA, as extensively reviewed in a series of excellent articles by the groups of Levitt [119], Papoian [120], Marrink [121] and Noid [122] among others, and a book chapter by Leonarski and Trylska [123]. We will limit ourselves here to the latest (from 2013) advances in particle-based CG methods, both those oriented towards the study of DNA in biological context [124•-133], and those designed for nanocomposites (see the recent revisions of Yingling et al [134] and Ouldridge [135] [142] have been used in both fields.…”
Section: Coarse-grain Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%