Modeling novelty habituation during exploratory activity in Drosophila

Abstract

Habituation is a common form of non-associative learning in which the organism gradually decreases its response to repeated stimuli. The decrease in exploratory activity of many animal species during exposure to a novel open field arena is a widely studied habituation paradigm. However, a theoretical framework to quantify how the novelty of the arena is learned during habituation is currently missing. Drosophila melanogaster display a high mean absolute activity and a high probability for directional persistence when first introduced to a novel arena. Both measures decrease during habituation to the arena. Here, we propose a phenomenological model of habituation for Drosophila exploration based on two principles: Drosophila form a spatial representation of the arena edge as a set of connected local patches, and repeated exposure to these patches is essential for the habituation of the novelty. The level of exposure depends on the number of visitations and is quantified by a variable referred to as “coverage.” This model was tested by comparing predictions against the experimentally measured behavior of wild type Drosophila. The novelty habituation of wild type Canton-S depends on coverage and is specifically independent of the arena radius. Our model describes the time dependent locomotor activity, ΔD, of Canton-S using an experimentally established stochastic process Pn(ΔD) which depends on the coverage. The quantitative measures of exploration and habituation were further applied to three mutant genotypes. Consistent with a requirement for vision in novelty habituation, blind no receptor potential A7 mutants display a failure in the decay of probability for directional persistence and mean absolute activity. The rutabaga2080 habituation mutant also shows defects in these measures. The kurtz1 non-visual arrestin mutant demonstrates a rapid decay in these measures, implying reduced motivation. The model and the habituation measures offer a powerful framework for understanding mechanisms associated with open field habituation.

Neurofibromin Loss of Function Drives Excessive Grooming in Drosophila

“…This configuration allowed us to quantify behavior in a less spatially confined environment, providing ample opportunity for locomotion and grooming. Similar to a previous report, we noted that the flies exhibited a tendency toward exploration of the boundary region ( Soibam et al 2013 ). Individual grooming behaviors were scored separately: head (including eyes and/or antennae), front legs, back legs, wings, or abdomen.…”

Speed dependent descending control of freezing behavior in Drosophila melanogaster

“…Since running is an alternative form of defensive behavior 23 , 34 , we next analyzed locomotor behavior excluding all freezing and grooming bouts, hence only periods classified as walking (>4 mm s −1 ). Walking speed gradually decreased during the baseline period, reflecting a common process of habituation to the test arena 35 . However, during stimulation, walking speed increased relative to baseline (median = 1.47 mm s −1 , IQR = 0.67–2.71.…”

Drosophila increase exploration after visually detecting predators

“…Both activity and P++ decrease as the fly habituates to the novel arena boundary [22, 23]. (a) In the presence of the pantropical jumping spider, Canton-S males significantly increase their activity during the early exploration of the arena, coverage 1–2.…”