2014
DOI: 10.1890/13-0570.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling nitrous oxide emissions from irrigated agriculture: testing DayCent with high‐frequency measurements

Abstract: A unique high temporal frequency data set from an irrigated cotton-wheat rotation was used to test the agroecosystem model DayCent to simulate daily N20 emissions from subtropical vertisols under different irrigation intensities. DayCent was able to simulate the effect of different irrigation intensities on N20 fluxes and yield, although it tended to overestimate seasonal fluxes during the cotton season. DayCent accurately predicted soil moisture dynamics and the timing and magnitude of high fluxes associated … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
10
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
3
10
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The emission factor (EF, a ratio of the difference in N 2 O emissions between N treatment and none N treatment to the applied N rate) ranged from 0.65 % to 0.72 % for measured data and from 0.43% to 0.95% for the simulated data, and both measured and simulated data showed an increase in EF with N application rates ( Table 6). The EF values were lower than the 1% value suggested by IPCC method (IPCC, 2006a), and similar results for measured and simulated EF below 1% were also reported for a cotton-wheat rotation system in Australia using DAYCENT model (Scheer et al, 2014). The above result indicates that the IPCC method is the worst scenario to calculate soil potential N 2 O emissions from applied N, in spite of high uncertainty (À70%e200%, IPCC, 2006b).…”
Section: Crop Yield N 2 O Emissions and N Budgets In Responses To Nsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…The emission factor (EF, a ratio of the difference in N 2 O emissions between N treatment and none N treatment to the applied N rate) ranged from 0.65 % to 0.72 % for measured data and from 0.43% to 0.95% for the simulated data, and both measured and simulated data showed an increase in EF with N application rates ( Table 6). The EF values were lower than the 1% value suggested by IPCC method (IPCC, 2006a), and similar results for measured and simulated EF below 1% were also reported for a cotton-wheat rotation system in Australia using DAYCENT model (Scheer et al, 2014). The above result indicates that the IPCC method is the worst scenario to calculate soil potential N 2 O emissions from applied N, in spite of high uncertainty (À70%e200%, IPCC, 2006b).…”
Section: Crop Yield N 2 O Emissions and N Budgets In Responses To Nsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…, Scheer et al. , Álvaro‐Fuentes et al. ), whereas DNDC has underestimated peak fluxes (Smith et al.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The model has been widely tested in upland soils (Plaza-Bonilla et al, 2014;Scheer et al, 2014;Congreves et al, 2015;Migliorati et al, 2015;Weiler et al, 2017). The model includes submodels for plant yield, crop residues and organic matter, soil water and temperature dynamics, and C and N gas fluxes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%