2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.artmed.2017.05.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling new immunoregulatory therapeutics as antimicrobial alternatives for treating Clostridium difficile infection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
26
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
26
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Constant Training Intensity over Multiple Sessions Experiment: Twentyeight individuals (12 males, 27 right-hand dominant, mean age of 23.0, age range of [19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30] were recruited for a 5-day training study. On each day, participants completed several cognitive tasks for up to 90 min total, including a 10 min session of the MATB-II.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Constant Training Intensity over Multiple Sessions Experiment: Twentyeight individuals (12 males, 27 right-hand dominant, mean age of 23.0, age range of [19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30] were recruited for a 5-day training study. On each day, participants completed several cognitive tasks for up to 90 min total, including a 10 min session of the MATB-II.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alternating Testing and Training Blocks Experiment: Six individuals (1 male, all right-hand dominant, mean age of 23.2, age range of [21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29] were randomized into two groups, and then each completed a single session of the AF-MATB. The data from two additional participants could not be used due to technical difficulties with the computer.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In previous in vitro studies, we harnessed neural networks to reveal that drugs and their doses (inputs) can be correlated to quantifiable measures of treatment efficacy and safety (outputs) through a parabolic response surface (PRS), which is governed by a second order polynomial . Importantly, unlike most conventional approaches which often involve fixed or static magnitudes of treatment, AI‐PRS is a disease indication‐agnostic approach that has been subsequently used to optimize both drug and dose selection as well as dynamic dosing from the preclinical through clinical stages of development without the need for complex disease mechanism data . More specifically, the PRS approach can be described using the following equation Vfalse(Cfalse)=x0+xiCi+yiCi2+zijCiCj V ( C ) is the efficacy, or viral load in this study, C i is the dose of drug i , and x 0 , x i , y i , and z ij are patient‐specific constants that are determined during the clinical calibration process .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, based on specific pathological markers, ML predicted the risk of sepsis with a high degree of confidence, even in the presence of incomplete and imbalanced data . ML algorithms were utilized to develop an in silico clinical trial pipeline for evaluating the efficacy of C. difficile treatments, and the model predicted that three treatments that are currently under development (antitoxin antibodies, LANCL2 activation and faecal microbiome transplantation) would all be superior to antibiotics in terms of the clinical outcomes . Applying ML tools to large microbiome data may be the cornerstone for new methods of data analysis which will assist clinicians in decision making with regard to whether antimicrobial therapy is needed in the treatment of patients with suspected infectious disease, and which will also contribute to unravelling the highly complex association of microbe communities within body niches to determine which groups or types of bacteria should be surveilled, in order to identify patients with cancer who are most at risk of developing invasive microbial infections (Fig.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%