The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2021
DOI: 10.1145/3486953
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling Movement Times and Success Rates for Acquisition of One-dimensional Targets with Uncertain Touchable Sizes

Abstract: In touch interfaces, a target, such as an icon, has two widths: the visual width and the touchable width. The visual width is the target's appearance, and the touchable width is the area in which users can touch a target and execute an action. In this study, we conduct two experiments to investigate the effects of the visual and touchable widths on touch pointing performance (movement time and success rate). Based on the results, we build candidate models for predicting the movement time and compare them by th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 21 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Incentives also modulate movement durations (Ashworth-Beaumont & Nowicky, 2013; Bogacz et al, 2010; Du et al, 2022; Listman et al, 2021; Thura et al, 2014), further supporting flexibility in the strategies the brain employs when selecting movement parameters. We also note that other studies of Fitts’ Law in virtual environments, where visual and physical dimensions of the target do not necessarily match, largely align with our results in showing that both the visual and motor dimensions can predict movement durations under specific contexts (Usuba et al, 2019, 2021). Future investigations can address other, perhaps more cognitive indicators of difficulty, such as the visually inferred weight or unwieldiness of a tool (Ellis & Lederman, 1993).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Incentives also modulate movement durations (Ashworth-Beaumont & Nowicky, 2013; Bogacz et al, 2010; Du et al, 2022; Listman et al, 2021; Thura et al, 2014), further supporting flexibility in the strategies the brain employs when selecting movement parameters. We also note that other studies of Fitts’ Law in virtual environments, where visual and physical dimensions of the target do not necessarily match, largely align with our results in showing that both the visual and motor dimensions can predict movement durations under specific contexts (Usuba et al, 2019, 2021). Future investigations can address other, perhaps more cognitive indicators of difficulty, such as the visually inferred weight or unwieldiness of a tool (Ellis & Lederman, 1993).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%