1995
DOI: 10.1007/bf02670767
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling microstructural development during the forging of Waspaloy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
73
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 146 publications
(90 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
5
73
0
Order By: Relevance
“…9) For example, Shen et al reported 468 kJ/mol as the activation energy for deformation of Waspaloy and Guimaraes et al estimaed the activation energy for recovery and recrystallization of Waspaloy as 330 and 430 kJ/mol, respectively. 10,11) It's confirmed that the activation energy of deformation obtained in this study is larger than activation energy of diffusion of compositional elements like other materials dominated by dynamic recrystallization behavior. However, the value is relatively small in some degree compared to those in previous reports of Waspaloy.…”
Section: Deformation Behaviorsupporting
confidence: 72%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…9) For example, Shen et al reported 468 kJ/mol as the activation energy for deformation of Waspaloy and Guimaraes et al estimaed the activation energy for recovery and recrystallization of Waspaloy as 330 and 430 kJ/mol, respectively. 10,11) It's confirmed that the activation energy of deformation obtained in this study is larger than activation energy of diffusion of compositional elements like other materials dominated by dynamic recrystallization behavior. However, the value is relatively small in some degree compared to those in previous reports of Waspaloy.…”
Section: Deformation Behaviorsupporting
confidence: 72%
“…(3) as ¹0.16 and ¹0.0456 for £ A subsolvus and supersolvus temperature region, respectively. 10) This report means that it is difficult to express the relationship between dynamically recrystallized grain diameter and ZenerHollomon parameter in one equation. Moreover the difference in n dyn between both temperature ranges was supposed to be induced by the presence of £ A particles during subsolvus hot working, which would lead Zener pinning of grain boundaries.…”
Section: Dynamically Recrystallized Grain Diametermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although there is some scatter in this plot, possibly due to an inhomogeneity of the initial microstructure/texture or inhomogeneous dissolution of primary alpha, the best straight-line fit of the slope yielded an Avrami exponent close to unity. Such a value has been reported a number of times for the recrystallization of hot-worked steels and nickel-base superalloys, [29][30][31] and has been variously ascribed to dimensionality effects, [32,33] in which the recrystallization *Assuming a diffusivity D of~0.1 lm 2 /s [28] and an alpha-particle radius r of 2.5 lm, the dissolution/homogenization time would be of the order of r 2 /2D~30 seconds. front grows in one-dimensional manner, or heterogeneous nucleation involving site-saturation behavior.…”
Section: A Transformation Kineticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…the coarse grain region and the fine grain region)always occurs; when forging temperature is up to1170ºC (Fig.8b) or above 1150ºC, the uniform grain size distribution is obtained. In other traditional wrought superalloy [7,9], such as IN 718, WASPALOY, etc. the banded structure seldom occurs during their hot working processes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%