2006
DOI: 10.1002/9781118407950.ch18
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling Melt Rate for DWPF: A Preliminary Assessment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Table 3 shows that the total modifier field strength of the SMEM-2 glass was the highest, but its estimated melting rate in Table 2 was 13% higher than that of SMEM-4. 13,25 Thus, formate has less adverse impact on melting rate than nitrate, which decomposes over a much wider temperature range extending above~900°C. But at the same time, high aluminum also appears to help melting of the cold cap by making the resulting melt more viscous and thus sluggish in closing the channels through which gases evolving at later stages of melting can escape.…”
Section: Factors Affecting Melting Ratementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Table 3 shows that the total modifier field strength of the SMEM-2 glass was the highest, but its estimated melting rate in Table 2 was 13% higher than that of SMEM-4. 13,25 Thus, formate has less adverse impact on melting rate than nitrate, which decomposes over a much wider temperature range extending above~900°C. But at the same time, high aluminum also appears to help melting of the cold cap by making the resulting melt more viscous and thus sluggish in closing the channels through which gases evolving at later stages of melting can escape.…”
Section: Factors Affecting Melting Ratementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, the formate decomposes early in the melting process releasing two-thirds of its calcine gases by~450°C. 13,25 Thus, formate has less adverse impact on melting rate than nitrate, which decomposes over a much wider temperature range extending above~900°C. 25,26 This explains why SMEM-2 exhibited the largest bed expansion (because it contained the highest concentration of nitrate).…”
Section: Factors Affecting Melting Ratementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Since a detailed description of the cold cap and MOG dynamics models along with the validation results is given elsewhere, [6][7][8] only some of the key features of each model are highlighted next.…”
Section: Existing Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The gas and solids products are allowed to reach equilibrium in each stage, before the former is passed on to the next stage up, while the latter is passed on to the next stage down, thereby maintaining countercurrent gas-solids flows between stages. 6 The temperature of each stage is set progressively higher from 700°C at the top (Stage 1) to the final melt temperature of 1150°C at the bottom (Stage 4). The temperature of Stage 1 was set based on the finding that the calculated molar ratio of CO to CO 2 in the calcine gas at 700 o C closely matched measured data.…”
Section: Cold Cap Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%