2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0301-4207(03)00004-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling materials flow of waste concrete from construction and demolition wastes in Taiwan

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
41
0
6

Year Published

2011
2011
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 95 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
41
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…While understanding of peace-time recycling is well established, and several models exist (Hsiao et al, 2002;Blengini, 2009), the effect of large quantities of specific debris types is not understood. Factors such as: the effect of surplus materials on existing recycling markets; the need for establishment of post-disaster markets (eg.…”
Section: Waste Treatment Optionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While understanding of peace-time recycling is well established, and several models exist (Hsiao et al, 2002;Blengini, 2009), the effect of large quantities of specific debris types is not understood. Factors such as: the effect of surplus materials on existing recycling markets; the need for establishment of post-disaster markets (eg.…”
Section: Waste Treatment Optionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of MFA studies are available related to construction and demolition waste for countries and regions such as China (Shi et al 2012 ;Huang et al 2013 ), Japan ), The Netherlands (Müller 2006 ), Norway (Bergsdal et al 2007 ), and Taiwan (Hsiao et al 2002 ); for cities such as Beijing (Hu, D. et al 2010 ;Hu, M. et al 2010 ); and for specifi c infrastructures such as highway traffi c system (Wen and Li 2010 ).…”
Section: Construction and Demolition Wastementioning
confidence: 99%
“…When looking at them at the country level, it is observed that different countries around the world have been investigated in this regard. Among them, there are (i) European countries such as Netherlands (Bossink & Brouwers, 1996), Greece (Banias, Achillas, Vlachokostas, Moussiopoulos & Papaioannou, 2011), Norway (Bergsdal, Bohne & Brattebo, 2007), Ireland (Kelly & Hanahoe, 2008) (Coelho & de Brito, 2011a,b;De Melo, Goncalves & Martins, 2011;Malia, de Brito, Pinheiro & Bravo, 2013), and Germany (Hoglmeier, Weber-Blaschke & Richter, 2013), (ii) Asian countries such as Hong Kong (Tam, 2008;Jaillon, Poon & Chiang, 2009;Cheng & Ma, 2013;Li & Zhang, 2013), Taiwan (Hsiao, Huang, Yu & Wernick, 2002), Malaysia (Begum, Siwar, Pereira & Jaafar, 2006;Lau, Whyte & Law, 2008;Che Hasan, Yusof, Mohd Ridzuan, Atan, Noordin & Abdul Ghani, 2013;Nagapan, Rahman, Asmi & Adnan, 2013), China (Li, Ding, Mi & Wang, 2013), Japan (Hashimoto, Tanikawa & Moriguchi, 2009), and Thailand (Kofoworola & Gheewala, 2009), (iii) American countries such as the US (Cochran & Townsend, 2010), Canada (Wimalasena, Ruwanpura & Hettiaratchi, 2010), and Brazil (Formoso, Soibelman, De Cesare & Isatto, 2002), (iv) Middle Eastern countries such as Kuwait (Kartam, Al-Mutairi, Al-Ghusain & Al-Humoud, 2004), Palestine (Al-Sari, Al-Khatib, Avraamides & Fatta-Kassinos, 2012), Israel (Katz & Baum, 2011), and Lebanon (Tamraz, Srour & Chehab, 2011), and lastly (v) Australia (McDonald & Smithers, 1998).…”
Section: Fresh Rmc Wastementioning
confidence: 99%