2010
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-12604-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling Machine Emotions for Realizing Intelligence

Abstract: The use of general descriptive names, registered names, trademarks, etc. in this publication does not imply, even in the absence of a specific statement, that such names are exempt from the relevant protective laws and regulations and therefore free for general use.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The nROUSE model explains temporal separation in general, with a particular application to word priming. To date, nROUSE has been applied to word priming (Huber, 2008) and word priming electrophysiology (Huber, Tian, et al, 2008), face priming (Rieth & Huber, 2010), immediate change detection (Davelaar, Tian, Weidemann, & Huber, 2011), recognition priming (Huber, Clark, Curran, & Winkielman, 2008), semantic satiation (Tian & Huber, 2010), semantic satiation electrophysiology (Tian & Huber, 2013), continuous flash suppression (Huber, 2015), the priming of affectively valenced pictures (Irwin, Huber, & Winkielman, 2010), and the attentional blink (Rusconi & Huber, submitted).…”
Section: The Nrouse Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The nROUSE model explains temporal separation in general, with a particular application to word priming. To date, nROUSE has been applied to word priming (Huber, 2008) and word priming electrophysiology (Huber, Tian, et al, 2008), face priming (Rieth & Huber, 2010), immediate change detection (Davelaar, Tian, Weidemann, & Huber, 2011), recognition priming (Huber, Clark, Curran, & Winkielman, 2008), semantic satiation (Tian & Huber, 2010), semantic satiation electrophysiology (Tian & Huber, 2013), continuous flash suppression (Huber, 2015), the priming of affectively valenced pictures (Irwin, Huber, & Winkielman, 2010), and the attentional blink (Rusconi & Huber, submitted).…”
Section: The Nrouse Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Habituation reduces source confusion from prior presentations, minimizing blending, but this produces a form of 'repetition blindness' (Kanwisher, 1987); lingering habituation makes it difficult to reactivate the same perceptual representation. The nROUSE model successfully explained many perceptual phenomena, including repetition and semantic priming of words (Huber, 2008), repetition priming of faces (Rieth & Huber, 2010), repetition priming of episodic recognition judgments (Huber, Clark, Curran, & Winkielman, 2008), semantic satiation (Tian & Huber, 2010), repetition priming of same/different judgments (Davelaar, Tian, Weidemann, & Huber, 2011), the priming of speeded affective valence responses (Irwin, Huber, & Winkielman, 2010), as well as the time course of evoked electrophysiological potentials for several of these paradigms (Huber, Tian, Curran, O'Reilly, & Woroch, 2008;Tian & Huber, 2013). Figure 1 shows the repetition priming results of Huber (2008).…”
Section: Perceptual Priming and The Nrouse Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The habituation model is a general account of perceptual dynamics and beyond its application to other word identification effects (Rieth and Huber 2017;Huber et al 2008b;Potter et al 2018;Davelaar et al 2011), it has been applied to repetition effects with faces (Rieth and Huber 2010), categories Huber 2010, 2013), spatial attention (Rieth and Huber 2013), and visual scenes (Irwin et al 2010), in tasks ranging from episodic recognition (Huber et al 2008a) to the attentional blink (Rusconi and Huber 2018). However, none of the prior studies examined the relationship between neural habituation and the perceptual decision making process (novelty detection).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%