2015
DOI: 10.1007/s00340-015-6032-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling laser-induced incandescence of soot: a new approach based on the use of inverse techniques

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 79 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…First, the formulation derived from the work of McCoy and Cha [ 18 ] has been considered since this widespread-used formulation directly applies when the heat conduction is expected to occur in the free-molecular regime, which is generally the case in LII studies conducted at atmospheric pressure. According to References [ 13 , 15 ], then equates as follows: where is the ambient pressure, (83.145 bar·cm 3 ·mol −1 ·K −1 ) and (8.3145 × 10 7 g·cm 2 ·mol −1 ·K −1 ·s −2 ) correspond to the universal gas constant expressed in effective pressure and mass units, respectively, represents the average molecular weight of air (28.74 g·mol −1 ) considered as a surrogate for flame gases, is the molar heat capacity at constant pressure (the expression of which can be found in Reference [ 13 ] based on a fit to data from the NIST-JANAF database [ 35 ]), (8.3145 J·mol −1 ·K −1 ) is the universal gas constant while and stand for the particle and surrounding gas temperatures, respectively. In addition, the updated formulation proposed by Michelsen et al in [ 19 ] has been tested.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…First, the formulation derived from the work of McCoy and Cha [ 18 ] has been considered since this widespread-used formulation directly applies when the heat conduction is expected to occur in the free-molecular regime, which is generally the case in LII studies conducted at atmospheric pressure. According to References [ 13 , 15 ], then equates as follows: where is the ambient pressure, (83.145 bar·cm 3 ·mol −1 ·K −1 ) and (8.3145 × 10 7 g·cm 2 ·mol −1 ·K −1 ·s −2 ) correspond to the universal gas constant expressed in effective pressure and mass units, respectively, represents the average molecular weight of air (28.74 g·mol −1 ) considered as a surrogate for flame gases, is the molar heat capacity at constant pressure (the expression of which can be found in Reference [ 13 ] based on a fit to data from the NIST-JANAF database [ 35 ]), (8.3145 J·mol −1 ·K −1 ) is the universal gas constant while and stand for the particle and surrounding gas temperatures, respectively. In addition, the updated formulation proposed by Michelsen et al in [ 19 ] has been tested.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The solving of the system of differential equations specified in Equation (1) leads to infer the variations of the particle temperature , mass , and diameter (considering spherical primary particles) as a function of space and time. LII signals can then be assessed by integrating the Planck function over the spectral range of the detection system, including its spectral response as previously done and explained in Reference [ 15 ]. The normal law derived from the TEM measurements carried out in Reference [ 29 ] has been integrated within the calculations so as to represent the size distribution of the primary particles, which is characterized by a mean diameter = 16.4 nm and a standard deviation = 3.3 at the investigated flame location (i.e., 92 mm HAB).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations