Proceedings of the 2022 International Joint Workshop on Multimedia Artworks Analysis and Attractiveness Computing in Multimedia 2022
DOI: 10.1145/3512730.3533717
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling Kansei Index for Images and Impression Estimation Using Fine Tuning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(4 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Machine learning-based indexing methods using review data can automatically generate a large amount of data, thus reducing the human and time load, but have the problems that a large amount of domain review data cannot always be obtained and that the review data does not always cover the impressions received by consumers. In a study by the authors [7] that attempted to solve these problems, the evaluation data covering impressions were collected to construct Kansei index while reducing human and temporal load, and Kansei index was estimated using a deep learning model. However, this study estimated the average impressions of respondents and did not address individual or attribute trends.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Machine learning-based indexing methods using review data can automatically generate a large amount of data, thus reducing the human and time load, but have the problems that a large amount of domain review data cannot always be obtained and that the review data does not always cover the impressions received by consumers. In a study by the authors [7] that attempted to solve these problems, the evaluation data covering impressions were collected to construct Kansei index while reducing human and temporal load, and Kansei index was estimated using a deep learning model. However, this study estimated the average impressions of respondents and did not address individual or attribute trends.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this section, we first describe the dataset creation, followed by the model training. We create the dataset in the same way as in previous research [7] . The dataset is created by first defining the Kansei evaluation axis, which is the evaluation factor of the domain, and then calculating the evaluation values for each attribute of the respondent's attributes.…”
Section: Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations