Proceedings of the Fifth ACM Conference on Recommender Systems 2011
DOI: 10.1145/2043932.2043941
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling item selection and relevance for accurate recommendations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The application of Information Retrieval metrics to recommender systems evaluation has been studied by several authors in the field (Barbieri et al, 2011;Breese et al, 1998;Cremonesi et al, 2010;Herlocker et al, 2004;Shani and Gunawardana, 2011). We elaborate here an experimental design framework that aims to synthesise commonalities and differences between studies, encompassing prior approaches and supporting new variants upon a common methodological grounding.…”
Section: Characterisation Of Design Alternatives In Ir Methodologies mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The application of Information Retrieval metrics to recommender systems evaluation has been studied by several authors in the field (Barbieri et al, 2011;Breese et al, 1998;Cremonesi et al, 2010;Herlocker et al, 2004;Shani and Gunawardana, 2011). We elaborate here an experimental design framework that aims to synthesise commonalities and differences between studies, encompassing prior approaches and supporting new variants upon a common methodological grounding.…”
Section: Characterisation Of Design Alternatives In Ir Methodologies mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this reason, researchers are turning towards metrics and methodologies from the Information Retrieval (IR) field (Barbieri et al, 2011;Cremonesi et al, 2010;Herlocker et al, 2004), where ranking evaluation has been studied and standardised for decades. Yet, gaps remain between the methodological formalisation of tasks in both fields, which result in divergences in the adoption of IR methodologies, hindering the interpretation and comparability of empirical observations by different authors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The case-based component retrieves the past student most similar to the candidate being evaluated. Additionally, a Bayesian probabilistic model for explicit preference data was presented by Barbieri et al (2011). Their model proposes a generative process, which takes into account both item selection and rating emission to bring into communities those users who experience the same items and tend to adopt the same rating pattern.…”
Section: Recent Studies In Recommendation Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Things change substantially when considering the precision and recall accuracy metrics. Based on the results in [31,70] (discussed in the previous chapter), we consider here also LDA model, which has been identified as one of the top-performers in terms of recommendation accuracy. Notice that LDA was not included in the analysis of predictive accuracy, as it does not explicitly support a way to compute rating prediction.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%