2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.irfa.2010.12.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling investment guarantees in Japan: A risk-neutral GARCH approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar to the observation from Table 5, it is observed from Figures 2–4 that compared to the proposed model the BM and JDBM models underestimate the E(PV) of the three guarantees. Similar results are obtained by Ng et al, 39 who shows that the fee obtained with GBM model is lesser compared to the fee obtained with the GARCH model.…”
Section: Empirical Analysissupporting
confidence: 88%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Similar to the observation from Table 5, it is observed from Figures 2–4 that compared to the proposed model the BM and JDBM models underestimate the E(PV) of the three guarantees. Similar results are obtained by Ng et al, 39 who shows that the fee obtained with GBM model is lesser compared to the fee obtained with the GARCH model.…”
Section: Empirical Analysissupporting
confidence: 88%
“…The difference is smaller for a death benefit guarantee as premiums for death benefit guarantees are very low compared to living benefit guarantee premium. 39 We have already shown in Section 3.1, the benefit of CBD forecasted probabilities over actual probabilities. The impact of these probabilities on GMDB, GMAB, and GMIB contracts is given in Table 6.…”
Section: F I G U R Ementioning
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Many standard criteria are used to select the appropriate model for the data. A risk‐neutral measure is obtained by following Siu‐Hang Li et al, 10 and Ng et al 11 for the proposed risky asset model. Moreover, we have considered the dynamic withdrawal strategy and surrender benefit.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The pricing of participating life insurance products with guarantees has been largely studied under the assumptions of the Black-Scholes option pricing model by Tiong [11], Milevsky and Posner [12], Lin et al [13], Ng et al [14], Gatzert and Holzmüller [15], and Fan [16]. However, when the historical prices of the underlying assets are analyzed and used as the basis for setting the pricing assumptions with respect to the risk model, it is possible to recognize that asset returns rarely meet the standard Brownian motion.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%