2022
DOI: 10.1021/acs.cgd.1c01433
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling Interfacial Evolutions at Atomistic Scale in the Process of Titanium Oxide Inducing Ferrite Nucleation in Steels

Abstract: First-principles calculation and Bramfitt misfit theory are employed to investigate the interface evolution between the precipitated titanium oxide inclusions and forming ferrite in steels. The results showed that there are nine possible stacking sites (Ti–O-1, Ti–O-2, Ti–O-3, Ti–Ti-1, Ti–Ti-2, Ti–Ti-3, O–Ti-1, O–Ti-2, and O–Ti-3) for the Fe(110)/Ti2O3(001) interface and three stacking sites (O-1, Ti-1, and Ti-2) for Fe(100)/TiO2(110). Among them, Ti–O-1, Ti–Ti-1, and O–Ti-3 are stable interfaces, while Ti–O-2… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure presents the construction of 16 heterojunction (S1–S16) of NiO(100) matching with anatase TiO 2 (101) through different termination surfaces based on the lattice mismatch theory. , As can be observed, two support modes were considered for first-principles calculations, including NiO(100) supported TiO 2 (101) (Figure a–h) and TiO 2 (101) supported NiO(100) (Figure i–p). The binding energy ( E b ) can evaluate the stability of the NiO-TiO 2 heterojunction, which is defined as , E normalb = E NiO TiO 2 E NiO E TiO 2 where E NiO‑TiO 2 , E NiO , and E TiO 2 represent the total energy of NiO-TiO 2 heterojunction, NiO, and TiO 2 , respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Figure presents the construction of 16 heterojunction (S1–S16) of NiO(100) matching with anatase TiO 2 (101) through different termination surfaces based on the lattice mismatch theory. , As can be observed, two support modes were considered for first-principles calculations, including NiO(100) supported TiO 2 (101) (Figure a–h) and TiO 2 (101) supported NiO(100) (Figure i–p). The binding energy ( E b ) can evaluate the stability of the NiO-TiO 2 heterojunction, which is defined as , E normalb = E NiO TiO 2 E NiO E TiO 2 where E NiO‑TiO 2 , E NiO , and E TiO 2 represent the total energy of NiO-TiO 2 heterojunction, NiO, and TiO 2 , respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…41−43 Figure 2 presents the construction of 16 heterojunction (S1−S16) of NiO(100) matching with anatase TiO 2 (101) through different termination surfaces based on the lattice mismatch theory. 44,45 As can be observed, two support modes were considered for first-principles calculations, including NiO(100) supported TiO…”
Section: ■ Computational Sectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The solute elements in steel, such as Mn, were poor around the inclusions. Their contents were significantly reduced within a certain range around the inclusions and a Mn-poor zone was formed, resulting in the local composition changes and inducing the IAF nucleation [34][35][36]. The inclusion point analysis of the welding HAZ in added-Ca steel is shown in Figure 11.…”
Section: Iaf Nucleation Mechanism Induced By Local Composition Changementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The chemical composition point analysis results of the inclusions in the welding HAZ in added-Ca steel are shown in Table 6. tents were significantly reduced within a certain range around the inclusio poor zone was formed, resulting in the local composition changes and ind nucleation [34][35][36]. The inclusion point analysis of the welding HAZ in add shown in Figure 11.…”
Section: Iaf Nucleation Mechanism Induced By Local Composition Changementioning
confidence: 99%