2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0950-5849(03)00015-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling imprecise requirements with XML

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…XML documents with incomplete information have been researched by (Serge Abiteboul, Segoufin, & Vianu, 2006) and probabilistic data has been researched by (Nierman & Jagadish, 2002). (Lee & Fanjiang, 2003) developed a fuzzy-object-oriented modelling technique based on the XML language to model requirement specifications and incorporated the notion of stereotypes to facilitate the modelling of imprecise requirements.…”
Section: Fuzzy Xml Modellingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…XML documents with incomplete information have been researched by (Serge Abiteboul, Segoufin, & Vianu, 2006) and probabilistic data has been researched by (Nierman & Jagadish, 2002). (Lee & Fanjiang, 2003) developed a fuzzy-object-oriented modelling technique based on the XML language to model requirement specifications and incorporated the notion of stereotypes to facilitate the modelling of imprecise requirements.…”
Section: Fuzzy Xml Modellingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fuzziness in the fuzzy XML data considered in (Lee and Fanjiang, 2003) comes from the fuzzy object-oriented modeling technique (FOOM) schema proposed in (Lee et al, 1999) because the FOOM schema is mapped to the XML schema and to the XML documents. Several kinds of fuzziness in fuzzy objects are identified in the FOOM schema, mainly including attribute with linguistic values, attribute with fuzzy sets and fuzzy classes.…”
Section: Fuzzy Data In Xml Documentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fuzzy classes directly result in fuzzy object-class relationships and fuzzy class-class relationships. Lee and Fanjiang (2003) introduce some new elements in the fuzzy XML documents, mainly including: "discrete-fuzzy-set", "object" and "membership-degree" for the discrete fuzzy sets; "fuzzy-set", "point", "f-value" and "membership-degree" for the continuous fuzzy sets; "fuzzy-attribute", "name", "fuzzy-range" and "linguistic-value" for the fuzzy attributes with linguistic values (on the continuous universe of discourse); "fuzzy-attribute", "name", "fuzzy-range", "typical-value" and "t-degree" for the fuzzy attributes with typical values (on the discrete universe of discourse). Also they introduce several new elements in the fuzzy XML documents for the representations of fuzzy rules and fuzzy associations.…”
Section: Fuzzy Data In Xml Documentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, it is important to specify not only how system objects interact to achieve the goal of each base use case, but also how these objects interact to implement the crosscutting concerns of each aspectual use case as well as where the effects take places with respect to the aspectual use case's corresponding base use cases. As a continuation of our previous research, [8][9][10]24 we augment the use case speciÞcation with aspectual property to document the responsibility of an aspectual use case. Through the speciÞcation of aspectual property, aspectual behavior can be modeled within the proposed aspectual sequence diagrams together with three types of aspectual interaction operators to perform on the base use cases.…”
Section: Aspectual Behaviors Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%