2020
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-62005-9_12
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling Implicit Communities from Geo-Tagged Event Traces Using Spatio-Temporal Point Processes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

5
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, these approaches are limited by the underlying datasets as it excludes two critical aspects of a mobility network; the social friendships and location categories. The social network is used to model the influence dynamics across different users [41,45] and the POI categories capture the different preferences of an individual [9,42]. We utilize user POI social networks for our model as these datasets provide both: a series of social dynamics for different users and location-specific interest patterns for a user.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, these approaches are limited by the underlying datasets as it excludes two critical aspects of a mobility network; the social friendships and location categories. The social network is used to model the influence dynamics across different users [41,45] and the POI categories capture the different preferences of an individual [9,42]. We utilize user POI social networks for our model as these datasets provide both: a series of social dynamics for different users and location-specific interest patterns for a user.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another approach [13] is a generic model for predicting user trajectories as well as next product recommendation. Recent approaches for checkin time prediction are limited to a single dataset [5,19,37]. They also model event-times as random variables rather than sequential flows and thus cannot be used for transfer across regions.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, Marked Temporal Point Processes(MTPP) have outperformed other neural architectures for characterizing asynchronous events localized in continuous time and are even used in a wide range of applications, including healthcare [29], finance [1,39], and social networks [15,23,40]. Recent works that deploy MTPP for predicting user mobility patterns are either: (i) limited to predicting the time of user-location interactions rather than actual locations [37], (ii) restricted to one dataset without a foreseeable way to easily utilize external information [19], or (iii) disregard the opportunity to reuse trained parameters from external datasets by jointly embedding the checkin and time distributions [5]. Thus, none of these approaches can be used for designing mobility prediction models for limited data regions.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Learning the dynamics of CTES is a non-trivial task with the neural models as it requires perpetual modeling of continuous-time and inter-event relationships [4,9,18]. Recent developments to marked temporal point processes (MTPP) [2,14] have shown an outstanding potential to characterize asynchronous events localized in continuous time that appear in a wide range of applications in healthcare [13], spatial networks [4,7,10], web and social networks [3,5,6,9], finance [1] and many more. However, modern MTPP models are limited to settings where the training data is completely observed i.e.…”
Section: Motivation and Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%