2007 IEEE Particle Accelerator Conference (PAC) 2007
DOI: 10.1109/pac.2007.4441281
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling imperfection effects on dipole modes in TESLA cavity

Abstract: The actual cell shapes of the TESLA cavities differ from the ideal ones due to fabrication errors, the addition of stiffening rings and the frequency tuning process. Cavity imperfections shift the dipole mode frequencies and alter the Qext's from those of the ideal cavity. The Qext increase could be problematic if its value exceeds the limit required for ILC beam stability. To study these effects, a cavity imperfection model was established using a mesh distortion method. The eigensolver Omega3P was then used … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Table 1 shows that, in this cavity, the frequency of the two measured modes in the first dipole band have been shifted downwards by ∼10 MHz with respect to the frequencies predicted by a 3D simulation, while the measured modes in the second dipole band have only small downward shifts. These numbers are consistent with the shifts predicted in simulations of cavities with manufacturing imperfections [6].…”
Section: Locating Dipole Modessupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Table 1 shows that, in this cavity, the frequency of the two measured modes in the first dipole band have been shifted downwards by ∼10 MHz with respect to the frequencies predicted by a 3D simulation, while the measured modes in the second dipole band have only small downward shifts. These numbers are consistent with the shifts predicted in simulations of cavities with manufacturing imperfections [6].…”
Section: Locating Dipole Modessupporting
confidence: 89%
“…In operation, the geometry of a particular TESLA cavity will differ from the design shown in Fig. 2b: the manufacturing process, tuning and multiphysical effects as cooling, Lorentz detuning and microphoning will introduce geometry variations [16,24,25,6]. In the simplest case, these variations can be expressed in terms of the design parameters, see Fig.…”
Section: Domain Parametrizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• Select the set of inversion variables for the deformed cavity [27]. Choose the ideal cavity as the initial guess (this is equivalent to setting d = 0).…”
Section: Outline Of the Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The selection of this set includes all the potential degrees of freedom that both has sensitivity the objective function, and known to have uncertainties in the manufacturing process. In general, we choose the set of unknown shape parameters such that the resulted inversion variable is a good approximation of the potential shape deformation [8,27]. We use the following measurement data in this example: The J f includes the 9 monopole frequencies and 36 HOM frequencies, and J E the field values for the 9 monopole modes.…”
Section: Shape Determination With Synthetic Datamentioning
confidence: 99%