1994
DOI: 10.1117/12.160980
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling human search and target acquisition performance: IV. detection probability in the cluttered environment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
33
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Another metric that purports to extract meaningful information about a target from a description of edge-based information is the target complexity (TC) metric of Tidhar et al (1994). The metric is similar to the POE, but it adds the assumption that target objects will have more pronounced edges than interior details.…”
Section: Williamsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Another metric that purports to extract meaningful information about a target from a description of edge-based information is the target complexity (TC) metric of Tidhar et al (1994). The metric is similar to the POE, but it adds the assumption that target objects will have more pronounced edges than interior details.…”
Section: Williamsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generally speaking, the more such information is present at the target location, the greater the probability or possible level of acquisition. The constructs used by the models are typically onedimensional metrics such as conspicuity (e.g., Toet, 1996), number of resolvable cycles, N, of a bar pattern (i.e., a square wave) on a target (Johnson, 1958), or complexity (e.g., Tidhar et al, 1994). Such metrics may apply to the location of the target only or they may apply to the entire scene.…”
Section: Models Based On Physiology and Empirical Human Psychophysicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The probability of edge metric (POE ) [38][39][40] is designed to imitate the human visual system, which is basically a band-pass filter and highly sensitive to image edges. The technical details of this metric are as follows: the given image is divided into blocks twice the size of the target in each dimension firstly; then a DOOG (Difference of Offset Gaussian) [41] operator is applied to each block to simulate one of the channels in preattentive human vision; after that, the net effect is used to enhance the edges; then, the resulting histogram of the processed scene is normalized to values between 0 and 255 for each scene, while the threshold is chosen empirically; finally, the fraction of points which pass the threshold T in the i-th block is computed as P OE i,T .…”
Section: Target Independent Metricsmentioning
confidence: 99%