All Days 2011
DOI: 10.2118/143875-ms
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling, History Matching, Forecasting and Analysis of Shale Reservoirs Performance Using Artificial Intelligence

Abstract: Producing hydrocarbon from Shale plays has attracted much attention in the recent years. Advances in horizontal drilling and multi-stage hydraulic fracturing have made shale reservoirs a focal point for many operators. Our understanding of the complexity of the flow mechanism in the natural fracture and its coupling with the matrix and the induced fracture, impact of geomechanical parameters and optimum design of hydraulic fractures has not necessarily kept up with our interest in these prolific and hydrocarbo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We believe that ITSPM is able to bring out the hidden information about the reservoir characteristics and its behavior, which is embedded within the production and field data. This technology has been incorporated in the top-down, intelligent-reservoir-modeling workflow that has been referenced extensively in this manuscript (Mohaghegh et al 2005;Mohaghegh 2009;Gomez et al 2009;Mohaghegh et al 2011). Geostatistic methods provide a full-field perception of the geological characteristics used in developing the fieldwide model.…”
Section: Conclusion and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We believe that ITSPM is able to bring out the hidden information about the reservoir characteristics and its behavior, which is embedded within the production and field data. This technology has been incorporated in the top-down, intelligent-reservoir-modeling workflow that has been referenced extensively in this manuscript (Mohaghegh et al 2005;Mohaghegh 2009;Gomez et al 2009;Mohaghegh et al 2011). Geostatistic methods provide a full-field perception of the geological characteristics used in developing the fieldwide model.…”
Section: Conclusion and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Simulator history matching usually uses a detailed geological model, relative permeability curves, and PVT data, and it adjusts permeability, porosity, and saturation. It is also possible to do probabilistic rate-transient analysis with numerical and analytical models that can account for uncertainty in the reservoir properties (Anderson and Liang 2011;Mohaghegh et al 2011;Chaudhri 2012;Olorode et al 2012;Souza et al 2012).…”
Section: Background and Related Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…As another example, a general limitation of AI-based data-analysis methods is that they need large amounts of data. For example, Mohaghegh et al (2011) reports that fullfield analyses with a combination of fuzzy logic and neural networks require data for 35 to 40 wells with 5 years of production history. Moreover, the training of neural-network-based models remains a task that often needs a significant investment of time and effort.…”
Section: Background and Related Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both industry and academia have already presented feasible numerical-simulation techniques and work flows for characterizing and simulating unconventional reservoirs. For example, fractures can be modelled explicitly (KAPPA 2015;Karimi-Fard et al 2003;Mirzaei and Cipolla 2012;Olorode et al 2012;Patzek et al 2014;Sun and Schechter 2014) as individual fractures; or upscaled and modelled by use of the dual-porosity/permeability approach (Yan et al 2013); or considered as embedded fractures (Moinfar et al 2011); or roughly modelled with fast-marching approaches (Xie et al 2015). Besides, field-production data have been incorporated into several numerical techniques such as decline-curve analysis, artificial intelligence, and data mining (Fuentes-Cruz et al 2014;Gong et al 2014;Mohaghegh et al 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%