2022
DOI: 10.1101/2022.08.09.503418
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling genotype × environment interaction for single- and multi-trait genomic prediction in potato (Solanum tuberosum L.)

Abstract: In this study we extend research on genomic prediction (GP) to polysomic polyploid plant species with the main objective to investigate single trait (ST) versus multi-trait (MT) for multi-environment (ME) models for the combination of three locations in Sweden (Helgegrden [HEL], Mosslunda [MOS], Ume [UM]) over two year-trials (2020, 2021) of 253 potato cultivars and breeding clones for five tuber weight traits and two tuber flesh quality characteristics. This research investigated the GP of four genome-based p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The  estimates also differed for total tuber yield among the four S1 offspring, suggesting that genomic predictions depend on the genetic background and may be effective for purging harmful alleles after inbreeding. Genomic prediction may be further improved in potato when using released cultivar and advanced breeding clones, by using a multi-trait, multi-environment GEBV modeling [36]. Modeling genotype × environment interaction in the multi-environment analyses may further exploit the information on the relationship between the site-year combinations, thereby leading to larger  than those from the single-environment analyses [33], while multi-trait genomic prediction may maximize genetic gain with respect to a focal trait while controlling the variation in multiple secondary traits in potato [36].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The  estimates also differed for total tuber yield among the four S1 offspring, suggesting that genomic predictions depend on the genetic background and may be effective for purging harmful alleles after inbreeding. Genomic prediction may be further improved in potato when using released cultivar and advanced breeding clones, by using a multi-trait, multi-environment GEBV modeling [36]. Modeling genotype × environment interaction in the multi-environment analyses may further exploit the information on the relationship between the site-year combinations, thereby leading to larger  than those from the single-environment analyses [33], while multi-trait genomic prediction may maximize genetic gain with respect to a focal trait while controlling the variation in multiple secondary traits in potato [36].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Genomic prediction may be further improved in potato when using released cultivar and advanced breeding clones, by using a multi-trait, multi-environment GEBV modeling [36]. Modeling genotype × environment interaction in the multi-environment analyses may further exploit the information on the relationship between the site-year combinations, thereby leading to larger  than those from the single-environment analyses [33], while multi-trait genomic prediction may maximize genetic gain with respect to a focal trait while controlling the variation in multiple secondary traits in potato [36]. Furthermore, deep learning [37] for genomic prediction of complex multigenic traits such as tuber yield may be worth pursuing in potato breeding.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MT models have more problems of convergence than ST models, and implementing MT models for genomic prediction is more challenging due to the size and complexity of the underlying data sets 25 . However, in a recent potato study on GS prediction, Cuevas et al 26 investigated ST versus MT in ME models for the combination of six environments for five tuber weight traits and two tuber flesh quality characteristics. The best predictive model was the MT for predicting several traits of potato observed in some environments and predicted in other environments.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MT models have more problems of convergence than ST models, and implementing MT models for genomic prediction is more challenging due to the size and complexity of the underlying data sets (Montesinos-López et al 2019c). However, in a recent potato study on GS prediction, Cuevas et al (2022) investigated ST versus MT in ME models for the combination of six environments for five tuber weight traits and two tuber flesh quality characteristics. The best predictive model was the MT for predicting several traits of potato observed in some environments and predicted in other environments.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%