SAE Technical Paper Series 2012
DOI: 10.4271/2012-01-0157
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling Fuel Spray Auto-ignition using the FGM Approach: Effect of Tabulation Method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is clear that the LOL for the 0D FGM case (LOL=12.84 mm) is much shorter than that predicted by the 1D FGM case (LOL=18.34 mm), which follows the same trend of IDT observations discussed earlier. A similar trend was also found by Eguz et al [10] while studying tabulation methods for "Spray A" where LOL is found to have an almost linear correlation with the IDT. The reasons for this can be explained by the higher production of the progress variable in the near nozzle region caused by early ignition in the 0D FGM.…”
Section: Comparing 0d Fgm and 1d Fgm Simulationssupporting
confidence: 83%
“…It is clear that the LOL for the 0D FGM case (LOL=12.84 mm) is much shorter than that predicted by the 1D FGM case (LOL=18.34 mm), which follows the same trend of IDT observations discussed earlier. A similar trend was also found by Eguz et al [10] while studying tabulation methods for "Spray A" where LOL is found to have an almost linear correlation with the IDT. The reasons for this can be explained by the higher production of the progress variable in the near nozzle region caused by early ignition in the 0D FGM.…”
Section: Comparing 0d Fgm and 1d Fgm Simulationssupporting
confidence: 83%
“…In previous studies, such value was generally found close to the LOL. 38,39 The baseline condition (O 2 = 15%, T = 900 K and r amb = 22:8 kg=m 3 ) was first considered to analyze ADF and FGM results. In particular, Figure 6 compares the computed heat release rate (RoHR) with the apparent experimental value.…”
Section: Experimental Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The implementation was, however, achieved by tabulating the reaction source terms in a library as a function of the mixture fraction Z , the scalar dissipation rate χ and the reaction progress variable C , estimated at the stoichiometric mixture fraction. Implementations such as this are sometimes referred to as flamelet-generated manifold methods 152154 and so the implementation of Bajaj et al can be referred to as an unsteady-flamelet-generated manifold (UFGM) method. This model was employed to obtain the results of Table 3 (shown earlier) for the ignition delay.…”
Section: Predictive Capability Of Multidimensional Spray Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%