Modeling Forest Stand Dynamics, Growth and Yield

Burkhart, Harold E.

doi:10.3390/f12111553

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 8 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The revolution in computing technology has affected growth and yield modeling as it has all fields of science [7]. Computationally intensive methods have been applied in various studies, showing that the use of machine learning methods has many advantages [8][9][10][11].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Machine Learning for the Estimation of Diameter Increment in Mixed and Uneven-Aged Forests

et al. 2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Estimating the diameter increment of forests is one of the most important relationships in forest management and planning. The aim of this study was to provide insight into the application of two machine learning methods, i.e., the multilayer perceptron artificial neural network (MLP) and adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system (ANFIS), for developing diameter increment models for the Hyrcanian forests. For this purpose, the diameters at breast height (DBH) of seven tree species were recorded during two inventory periods. The trees were divided into four broad species groups, including beech (Fagus orientalis), chestnut-leaved oak (Quercus castaneifolia), hornbeam (Carpinus betulus), and other species. For each group, a separate model was developed. The k-fold strategy was used to evaluate these models. The Pearson correlation coefficient (r), coefficient of determination (R2), root mean square error (RMSE), Akaike information criterion (AIC), and Bayesian information criterion (BIC) were utilized to evaluate the models. RMSE and R2 of the MLP and ANFIS models were estimated for the four groups of beech ((1.61 and 0.23) and (1.57 and 0.26)), hornbeam ((1.42 and 0.13) and (1.49 and 0.10)), chestnut-leaved oak ((1.55 and 0.28) and (1.47 and 0.39)), and other species ((1.44 and 0.32) and (1.5 and 0.24)), respectively. Despite the low coefficient of determination, the correlation test in both techniques was significant at a 0.01 level for all four groups. In this study, we also determined optimal network parameters such as number of nodes of one or multiple hidden layers and the type of membership functions for modeling the diameter increment in the Hyrcanian forests. Comparison of the results of the two techniques showed that for the groups of beech and chestnut-leaved oak, the ANFIS technique performed better and that the modeling techniques have a deep relationship with the nature of the tree species.

show abstract