2014
DOI: 10.1007/s10665-014-9697-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling flow of nematic liquid crystal down an incline

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
25
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the work of Sharma & Verma (2004), the solution that satisfies the above far-field conditions is referred to as a pancake solution. We will refer to this solution as a front solution since (4.22) and (4.23) are analogous to the far-field conditions used for a travelling front solution in our previous work (see Lam et al 2014). Note that the same nomenclature is used by Thiele et al (2001); the derivation of the front solution in that work is slightly different to that presented here, however, the two methods yield the same result.…”
Section: Metastability: Analytical Findingsmentioning
confidence: 83%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In the work of Sharma & Verma (2004), the solution that satisfies the above far-field conditions is referred to as a pancake solution. We will refer to this solution as a front solution since (4.22) and (4.23) are analogous to the far-field conditions used for a travelling front solution in our previous work (see Lam et al 2014). Note that the same nomenclature is used by Thiele et al (2001); the derivation of the front solution in that work is slightly different to that presented here, however, the two methods yield the same result.…”
Section: Metastability: Analytical Findingsmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…where ∇G(h) is the gradient of the free surface anchoring energy. The derivation of G(h) is nontrivial and we refer the reader to our previous work for further details (Lam et al 2014;Lin et al 2013b). Since the second term on the right hand side of the last equation in (2.22) is always stabilising, instability arises from the gradients of the free surface anchoring energy (the last term in (2.22)), present only for non-constant m(h) (i.e., only for weak anchoring).…”
Section: Comparison To Other Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…17, to give U = w p R/H. As an inclined plane and channel flows (see, for example, [23][24][25][26][27]).…”
Section: Boundary Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(65), and integrate with respect tor and impose the condition on the pressure gradient, Eq. (26), which leads to…”
Section: The Limit Of Small Ericksen Numbermentioning
confidence: 99%