2014
DOI: 10.1080/10643389.2013.829978
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling Fecal Indicator Bacteria Concentrations in Natural Surface Waters: A Review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
88
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 117 publications
(90 citation statements)
references
References 201 publications
1
88
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Without the decay process FIB concentrations were found to be one or two orders of magnitude higher. This is in agreement with the studies by Brauwere et al (2014) and Ouattara et al (2013).…”
Section: Impact Of Different Processes On Fib Concentrationssupporting
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Without the decay process FIB concentrations were found to be one or two orders of magnitude higher. This is in agreement with the studies by Brauwere et al (2014) and Ouattara et al (2013).…”
Section: Impact Of Different Processes On Fib Concentrationssupporting
confidence: 83%
“…This is also consistent with the values used by Liu et al (2006). The salinity coefficient (θS) was set to 1.006 for both the bacteria based on the values reported in the literature (Canteras et al, 1995, McCorquodale et al, 2004, Brauwere et al, 2014. A constant light intensity of 0.14 kW/m 2 was assigned in the model, which was based on the study area's daily average light intensity and daily sunshine hours data, collected from NASA's satellite derived data centre and the Bangladesh Meteorological Department respectively.…”
Section: Microbial Water Quality Modelmentioning
confidence: 53%
“…They can also help specify where future monitoring efforts are most needed and the results based on a particular site can be used to guide field investigations in other areas with similar hydrogeology and land use (Mair and El-Kadi 2013). Regressionbased models are particularly useful in operational contexts (de Brauwere et al 2014). Their use is common in the literature in studies on risk factors for microbial groundwater contamination, which have focused on: coliform bacteria in rural wells in Iowa, USA (Glanville et al 1997), the link between Cryptosporidium and onsite wastewater systems and private (Tollestrup et al 2014), Escherichia coli (E. coli) in 211 wells in the Republic of Ireland (Hynds et al 2014), E. coli in groundwater sources in northern, rural Malawi (Kanyerere et al 2012), coliform bacteria in shallow wells in Ibadan, Nigeria (Oguntoke et al 2013), TTCs and faecal streptococci in shallow groundwater in Kampala, Uganda (Howard et al 2003), enterococci and TTCs in shallow groundwater sources in Lichinga, Mozambique (Godfrey et al 2006), and faecal coliform and faecal streptococci in rural areas in Burkina Faso (Guillemin et al 1991).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The pathogenic E. coli, however, is not the only danger present in domestic sewage. In fact, in the present study, we regarded it principally as an indicator of overall pollution risk (de Brauwere et al 2014b). The management of that risk starts long before the outfall step, because the construction of a waste management technique requires hydrodynamic modeling that can assess the environmental impacts on the surrounding ecosystems (Fernández, 2011, Yang et al, 2000.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%