2005
DOI: 10.1021/ja055092c
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling Errors in NOE Data with a Log-normal Distribution Improves the Quality of NMR Structures

Abstract: The distribution of the deviation of calculated from measured nuclear Overhauser effect (NOE) intensities is a priori unknown. The use of a log-normal distribution to describe these deviations permits the direct calculation of a structure from the measured intensities without first converting them into distance bounds. We show that the log-normal distribution is a natural choice for describing errors in NOE data and that it improves the accuracy, precision, and quality of the calculated structures compared to … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
31
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

5
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We studied two error distributions: The first assumes a Gaussian shape with a flat plateau for distances between δ ± 0.2 × a in accordance with the approach by Nagano et al [11]. The second model is a lognormal distribution [32]. Both error models depend on an additional unknown error parameter σ , which reflects how well the experimental distance agrees with the model distance.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We studied two error distributions: The first assumes a Gaussian shape with a flat plateau for distances between δ ± 0.2 × a in accordance with the approach by Nagano et al [11]. The second model is a lognormal distribution [32]. Both error models depend on an additional unknown error parameter σ , which reflects how well the experimental distance agrees with the model distance.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second error model is a lognormal distribution, which was introduced by Rieping et al [32] to describe errors of inherently positive quantities such as distance measurements: In both error models, σ quantifies the error of the Hi-C distance measurements.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The initial structures of the pilins were maintained in a flexible and adaptive way using log-harmonic distance restraints and automated weighting (Nilges et al, 2008) on the alpha carbons, apart from the two N-terminal residues (and the two C-terminal residues for the PulG pilin, for which no structural template was available). A log-harmonic distance restraint potential is derived from the log-normal distribution (Rieping et al, 2005) and depends on the square of the difference of the logarithms of the distances (Nilges et al, 2008):…”
Section: Use Of Conformational Restraintsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To evaluate a single restraint r i , we adopt the log-normal distribution advocated by Nilges and coworkers (Rieping et al, 2005a as a better representation of the errors in NOE distances and NMR data than the traditional flat-bottom harmonic well (FBHW). The FBHW suffers from problems including subjectiveness associated with fixing the bounds for the well ; the log-normal more gracefully degrades, and we integrate out its variance parameter s. Furthermore, the log-normal is non-negative and multiplicative.…”
Section: Inferential Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%