2019
DOI: 10.3389/fbuil.2019.00007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling Error Estimation and Response Prediction of a 10-Story Building Model Through a Hierarchical Bayesian Model Updating Framework

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
(42 reference statements)
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…where c is a constant value. Considering the covariance matrix θθ Σ to be symmetric, the optimization will involve (24) Note that the MAP estimation of θ μ can be calculated directly from Eq. (23) giving:…”
Section: Uncertainty Quantificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…where c is a constant value. Considering the covariance matrix θθ Σ to be symmetric, the optimization will involve (24) Note that the MAP estimation of θ μ can be calculated directly from Eq. (23) giving:…”
Section: Uncertainty Quantificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In structural dynamics, Behmanesh et al [14] have developed a hierarchical framework to model and consider the variability of modal parameters over dissimilar experiments. This framework has found extensive applications in uncertainty quantification and propagation of dynamical models based on experimental modal data when they are updated and calibrated under modeling errors [23][24][25]. Nagel and Sudret [26,27] have proposed a unified multilevel Bayesian framework for calibrating dynamical models for the special case of having noise-free vibration measurements.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This assumption ignores the stiffness correlations of different structural components. Alternatively, a full covariance matrix can be estimated to characterize the stiffness correlations in off-diagonal terms, as it is done in some recent studies [ 53 , 57 , 58 ]. The error function distribution is often assumed to be zero-mean, i.e., , which neglects error bias and causes an inflated estimation of error covariance in applications with error bias.…”
Section: Uncertainty Quantification and Propagation Through Hierarmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An important feature of hierarchical Bayesian model updating is the capability to provide accurate and realistic confidence bounds on response predictions, by propagating the estimated structural parameters variability and error function uncertainty, as shown in Figure 2 . When response predictions of unobserved quantities (where error function estimate is not available) are required, two strategies can be adopted: (1) only consider and propagate the structural parameters variability into response predictions when error function is relatively small and negligible [ 44 , 53 ]; (2) extend the error function to unobserved degrees of freedom (DOFs) as proposed by Song et al [ 58 ] and validated through a numerical study. As mentioned previously, in most civil structure applications, error function uncertainty must be included in model-predictions to fully capture the measurement variability.…”
Section: Uncertainty Quantification and Propagation Through Hierarmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation