2015
DOI: 10.1109/tetc.2015.2398353
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling Epidemics Spreading on Social Contact Networks

Abstract: Social contact networks and the way people interact with each other are the key factors that impact on epidemics spreading. However, it is challenging to model the behavior of epidemics based on social contact networks due to their high dynamics. Traditional models such as susceptible-infected-recovered (SIR) model ignore the crowding or protection effect and thus has some unrealistic assumption. In this paper, we consider the crowding or protection effect and develop a novel model called improved SIR model. T… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
50
0
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
2
50
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The results obtained from both of the simulations show that diseases spread even more in social contact networks having greater average of degree. Some dormant immunization strategies have been presented in this work as well to support the findings [3].…”
Section: Literature Reviewsupporting
confidence: 68%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The results obtained from both of the simulations show that diseases spread even more in social contact networks having greater average of degree. Some dormant immunization strategies have been presented in this work as well to support the findings [3].…”
Section: Literature Reviewsupporting
confidence: 68%
“…The existing techniques for evaluating the centrality measures involve a neighborhood-based approach and a shortest path algorithm approach. The neighborhood approach makes use of the key features of a node such as the degree centrality (DC) and Eigenvector centrality (EVC), while the shortest path approach utilizes the betweenness centrality (BC) and the closeness centrality (CC) measures [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, epidemic theory has found applications in various different fields, covering virus/disease spreading (both biological and digital ones) (e.g., [1] [5]) and corresponding immunization strategies (e.g., [26] [27] [28] [29]), information dissemination in (online) social networks (e.g., [30]), communication protocol design (e.g., [31] [32] [33]) and cascading failure prediction/protection (e.g., [34]) as well as in more general contexts, analysis on stability of spreading processes over time-varying networks (e.g., [35]) and iden-tification of influential seeds/spreaders in networks (e.g., [36]). …”
Section: Background Basics and Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Early studies on social networks were limited by manual data collection and considered at most hundreds of individuals [39]. Later, social network analysis (SNA) became an interesting topic for many other sectors and research fields, including recommender systems [24], [31]; marketing [7]; intelligence analysis [35]; network structure [16]; modeling epidemics spreading [44]; clustering and community detection [6], [9], [15], [17], [18], [23] and complex systems [19]. Massive use of electronic devices and online communication leaves traces of human interaction and relationships, such as phone call records, e-mail records, etc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%