2019
DOI: 10.1037/cou0000322
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling empathy as synchrony in clinician and patient vocally encoded emotional arousal: A failure to replicate.

Abstract: Empathy is a well-defined active ingredient in clinical encounters. To measure empathy, the current gold standard is behavioral coding (i.e. trained coders attribute overall ratings of empathy to clinician behaviors within an encounter), which is labor intensive and subject to important reliability challenges. Recently, an alternative measurement has been proposed: capturing empathy as synchrony in vocally encoded arousal, which can be measured as the mean fundamental frequency of the voice (mean F0). This met… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
19
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
(103 reference statements)
1
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Such synchronization concerning silence was expected based on previous research of turn taking, mainly in mothers and infants (Jaffe et al, 2001). This observed synchronization might also occur in psychotherapy, making silence one of the synchronizing modalities in psychotherapy (see Gaume et al, 2019;Imel et al, 2014;Kleinbub, 2017;Paulick et al, 2018;Reich, Berman, Dale, & Levitt, 2014;Schultz et al, 2016 for other modalities). Interestingly, the second principal component (PC2), which explained 27% of variance in the silence data, showed a negative correlation mainly between patient and therapist pauses.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Such synchronization concerning silence was expected based on previous research of turn taking, mainly in mothers and infants (Jaffe et al, 2001). This observed synchronization might also occur in psychotherapy, making silence one of the synchronizing modalities in psychotherapy (see Gaume et al, 2019;Imel et al, 2014;Kleinbub, 2017;Paulick et al, 2018;Reich, Berman, Dale, & Levitt, 2014;Schultz et al, 2016 for other modalities). Interestingly, the second principal component (PC2), which explained 27% of variance in the silence data, showed a negative correlation mainly between patient and therapist pauses.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The average kappa score across all measures was 0.73. All individual kappa scores were above the cutoff for "substantial" or "acceptable" agreement except for two variables (i.e., holding toy object and passive play-two variables that meet current standards for "moderate" agreement; Danko et al, 2016;Ladd et al, 2016;Marquis et al, 2017;Yao et al, 2017;Gaume et al, 2019). Neither of these variables were significant for the analysis presented in this paper.…”
Section: Behavioral Codingmentioning
confidence: 71%
“… 28 Patients’ and physicians’ MFF was automatically measured every 0.25 seconds using Praat software version 5.3.82. The correlation between the patient’s and physician’s MFF was then computed across minutes while controlling for physician’s and patient’s gender (see Gaume et al 29 and Baldwin et al 30 for model details), ending with SVMFF scores ranging from −1 = total dyssynchrony (for example, patient displaying elevation of voice pitch while physician uses low pitch) to 1 = total synchrony.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We also thank Dr Kevin Hallgren, who extracted Synchrony of Vocal Mean Fundamental Frequencies indices based on the models calculated in a previous study. 29 …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%