2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.ultramic.2004.07.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling electric-field-sensitive scanning probe measurements for a tip of arbitrary shape

Abstract: We present a numerical method to model electric-field-sensitive scanning probe microscopy measurements which allows for a tip of arbitrary shape and invokes image charges to exactly account for a sample dielectric overlayer. The method is applied to calculate the spatial resolution of a subsurface charge accumulation imaging system, achieving reasonable agreement with experiment.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
21
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
(21 reference statements)
5
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2d implies an effective lever arm of α tip = 1/10.8. This is a reasonable value, consistent with the expected tip-sample mutual capacitance [25][26][27] .…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…2d implies an effective lever arm of α tip = 1/10.8. This is a reasonable value, consistent with the expected tip-sample mutual capacitance [25][26][27] .…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…This means the nanometer-scale radius of curvature of the tip is relevant for capacitance measurement techniques. To maximize the amplitude of the signal without compromising spatial resolution, the tip radius should be approximately equal to the depth of the dopant layer beneath the surface 8,9 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the most schematic level, this technique treats the scanned tip as one plate of a parallel-plate capacitor, although realistic analysis requires a more detailed description to account for the curvature of the tip 8,9 . The other plate in this model is a nanoscale region of the underlying conducting layer, as shown in Figure 1.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Eriksson et al and Kuljanishvilli et al [19] showed that w is equal to the depth of the layer below the exposed surface and that the accuracy of the expression holds to a few percent, if the depth of the layer is comparable to or greater than the radius of curvature of the tip's apex. To estimate of the radial dependence of the donor-layer potential P(r), we note that for our sample the donor layer is only 20 nm from the underlying 2D layer; the apex of the tip is three times farther away.…”
Section: Approximate Expressionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(2) and (3), where we have used V trap 0 eP(0))=500 mV, V exc =15 mV and the bell-functions calculated in (c) For these parameters we find a charging peak of width HWHM(D)=32 mV, roughly double the width of a single-electron peak. [19]. Here we show the case for which both conductors i and k are part of the tip and k is a distance S from the sample dielectric surface.…”
Section: Numerical Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%