2017
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-07153-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling Dominant and Recessive Forms of Retinitis Pigmentosa by Editing Three Rhodopsin-Encoding Genes in Xenopus Laevis Using Crispr/Cas9

Abstract: The utility of Xenopus laevis, a common research subject for developmental biology, retinal physiology, cell biology, and other investigations, has been limited by lack of a robust gene knockout or knock-down technology. Here we describe manipulation of the X. laevis genome using CRISPR/Cas9 to model the human disorder retinitis pigmentosa, and to introduce point mutations or exogenous DNA sequences. We introduced and characterized in-frame and out-of-frame insertions and deletions in three genes encoding rhod… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
25
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
2
25
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, in the case of rhodopsin adRP, any CRISPR approach must be allele specific or it would convert an adRP phenotype to a more severe arRP one, and these studies have not been done on human rhodopsin genomic sequences in the context of one mutant and one WT allele. Furthermore, a recent study of CRISPR/Cas9 targeting in fertilised Xenopus eggs showed that in-frame deletions frequently caused dominant retinal degeneration associated with rhodopsin biosynthesis defects, while frameshift phenotypes were consistent with knockout (Feehan et al, 2017). Given that NHEJ is random, there is almost a 1:3 chance that CRISPR gene editing could replace one dominant rhodopsin mutation with another dominant mutation within individual rods, even if the editing were allele specific.…”
Section: Therapeutic Approaches To Rhodopsin Rpmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, in the case of rhodopsin adRP, any CRISPR approach must be allele specific or it would convert an adRP phenotype to a more severe arRP one, and these studies have not been done on human rhodopsin genomic sequences in the context of one mutant and one WT allele. Furthermore, a recent study of CRISPR/Cas9 targeting in fertilised Xenopus eggs showed that in-frame deletions frequently caused dominant retinal degeneration associated with rhodopsin biosynthesis defects, while frameshift phenotypes were consistent with knockout (Feehan et al, 2017). Given that NHEJ is random, there is almost a 1:3 chance that CRISPR gene editing could replace one dominant rhodopsin mutation with another dominant mutation within individual rods, even if the editing were allele specific.…”
Section: Therapeutic Approaches To Rhodopsin Rpmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In vitro fertilization and microinjections were performed at 18°C as previously described (Feehan et al, 2017). Eggs and sperm were incubated in a petri dish for 20 min, the follicle cell sheath was removed from fertilized embryos using 2% cysteine and gentle shaking, and then the embryos were tightly packed into a monolayer in 2% agarose injection plates flooded with 0.4x MMR + 6% Ficoll.…”
Section: Microinjections Embryo Selection and Tadpole Rearingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Xenopus embryos have long been used to study fundamental aspects of early eye development and are used to model diseases such as microphthalmia, retinitis pigmentosa, exudative vitreoretinopathy, and aniridia. Feehan et al (2017) utilized CRISPR/Cas9-mediated mutations in Xenopus genes encoding rhodopsin to model both dominant and recessive forms of retinitis pigmentosa, a disease caused by retinal degeneration that leads to gradual loss of sight. Assays on retinal extracts and confocal microscopy were used to characterize the genotype-phenotype relationships.…”
Section: The Landscape Of Human Disease Research In Xenopusmentioning
confidence: 99%