2023
DOI: 10.1016/bs.mie.2023.06.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling diffuse scattering with simple, physically interpretable models

Ariana Peck,
Thomas J. Lane,
Frédéric Poitevin
Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 43 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Building on the diffuse scattering methods used in materials science [exemplified by programs such as XCAVATE (Estermann & Steurer, 1998;Scheidegger et al, 2000), Mantid (Arnold et al, 2014) and Meerkat (Simonov et al, 2020)], software tools including Lunus (Wall, 2009), EVAL (Schreurs et al, 2010), Diffuse (Peck et al, 2018) and mdx-lib (Meisburger et al, 2020) have been developed to address unique challenges in macromolecular diffuse scattering. These programs produce patterns that can be compared quantitatively with various models (Wych & Wall, 2023;Case, 2023;Peck et al, 2023).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Building on the diffuse scattering methods used in materials science [exemplified by programs such as XCAVATE (Estermann & Steurer, 1998;Scheidegger et al, 2000), Mantid (Arnold et al, 2014) and Meerkat (Simonov et al, 2020)], software tools including Lunus (Wall, 2009), EVAL (Schreurs et al, 2010), Diffuse (Peck et al, 2018) and mdx-lib (Meisburger et al, 2020) have been developed to address unique challenges in macromolecular diffuse scattering. These programs produce patterns that can be compared quantitatively with various models (Wych & Wall, 2023;Case, 2023;Peck et al, 2023).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%