2019
DOI: 10.3389/fevo.2019.00168
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling Current and Future Potential Distributions of Milkweeds and the Monarch Butterfly in Idaho

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
19
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 89 publications
1
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The overall average test MaxEnt background/presence AUC bgp for the four milkweed species niche models was 0.87 (range 0.81 to 0.90), which was very similar to the average of test AUC bgp values of 0.86 (range 0.76-0.91) reported for the western ranges of 13 milkweeds by Dilts et al (2019), but lower than the test AUC bgp values of 0.98 and 0.93 reported for the Idaho ranges of two milkweeds by Svancara et al (2019). Our values of test AUC bgp were 5-8% lower than pseudoabsence AUC psa , and this was probably a result of lower false negative error rates that would arise in AUC psa since the pseudoabsence data were buffered 20-km from presence points.…”
Section: Niche Modelingsupporting
confidence: 75%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The overall average test MaxEnt background/presence AUC bgp for the four milkweed species niche models was 0.87 (range 0.81 to 0.90), which was very similar to the average of test AUC bgp values of 0.86 (range 0.76-0.91) reported for the western ranges of 13 milkweeds by Dilts et al (2019), but lower than the test AUC bgp values of 0.98 and 0.93 reported for the Idaho ranges of two milkweeds by Svancara et al (2019). Our values of test AUC bgp were 5-8% lower than pseudoabsence AUC psa , and this was probably a result of lower false negative error rates that would arise in AUC psa since the pseudoabsence data were buffered 20-km from presence points.…”
Section: Niche Modelingsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…asperula, spider milkweed) in the western US. Svancara et al (2019) developed current and future climate MaxEnt niche models for A. speciosa (showy milkweed) and A. incarnata (swamp milkweed) in Idaho. Kass et al (2020) found that combined stacked climatic niche models of 20 Asclepias spp.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent climatic shifts, particularly warmer, wetter temperatures during breeding season and warmer temperatures during pupal overwintering season, have allowed P. cresphontes to rapidly expand northward to now match or even surpass the slower moving northward range expansion of the northernmost host plant, Z. americanum, with further northward expansion of P. cresphontes now limited by host plant range, not climate (Figure 4). Our results highlight the importance of including biotic interactions (and interactions between herbivorous insects and host plants in particular) in examinations of range shifts and their speed, an idea often highlighted, (Urban et al, 2016) but infrequently implemented (Lemoine, 2015;Dilts et al, 2019;Svancara et al, 2019). Poleward range shifts in herbivorous insects, particularly butterflies, have been documented for a number of species (Parmesan et al, 1999;Warren et al, 2001;Pöyry et al, 2009;Breed et al, 2012).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…4). Our results highlight the importance of including biotic interactions (and interactions between herbivorous insects and host plants in particular) in examinations of range shifts, an idea often highlighted, (Urban et al , 2016) but infrequently implemented (Lemoine, 2015;Dilts et al , 2019;Svancara et al , 2019) .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 68%