2020
DOI: 10.1111/ajae.12152
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling Corners, Kinks, and Jumps in Crop Acreage Choices: Impacts of the EU Support to Protein Crops

Abstract: Null crop acreages raise pervasive issues when modelling acreage choices with farm data. We revisit these issues and emphasize that null acreage choices arise not only due to binding nonnegativity constraints but also due to crop production fixed costs. Based on this micro-economic background, we present a micro-econometric multi-crop model that consistently handles null acreages and accounts for crop production fixed costs. This multivariate endogenous regime switching model allows for specific crop acreage p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We divide farm-level fertilizer expenses by the country-level fertilizer price to measure fertilizer quantities at the farm level. For other material inputs (e.g., seed, pesticides, material, energy, contract services, and water use), we calculate implicit quantities by dividing total expenses by a Tornquist price index 12 (e.g., Henry de Frahan et al, 2011;Koutchadé et al, 2021) constructed at the regional (NUTS 2) level. Following Lacroix and Thomas (2011), we chose other material inputs as the numeraire in our estimation procedure, because no physical quantity for this input can be obtained from the accountancy data set.…”
Section: Farm Production Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We divide farm-level fertilizer expenses by the country-level fertilizer price to measure fertilizer quantities at the farm level. For other material inputs (e.g., seed, pesticides, material, energy, contract services, and water use), we calculate implicit quantities by dividing total expenses by a Tornquist price index 12 (e.g., Henry de Frahan et al, 2011;Koutchadé et al, 2021) constructed at the regional (NUTS 2) level. Following Lacroix and Thomas (2011), we chose other material inputs as the numeraire in our estimation procedure, because no physical quantity for this input can be obtained from the accountancy data set.…”
Section: Farm Production Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More recently, Cortignani & Dono (2020) show that the expansion of legume crops promoted by the greening measures of the CAP improved the environmental balance of Italian farms as expected, but to the detriment of economic (income) and social (salaried and non-salaried work) impacts. Lastly, using a micro-econometric model that takes into account the heterogeneity of French agricultural holdings, Koutchadé et al (2021) quantify the impact of coupled subsidies on extensive margins, i.e. on decisions to include legumes in crop rotation.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The maximisation programme depends on input and output prices, fixed factors (material and building capital, total agricultural surface area and self-employed labour) and technological possibilities. For the latter, we follow Koutchadé et al (2021) and model crop yields using a quadratic function specific to each crop, dependent on the quantities of inputs used (fertilisers and plant protection products). However, these yields do not depend on the number of hectares cultivated.…”
Section: The Behaviour Of Agricultural Producersmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, it is parameterintensive. To reduce the number of parameters, the logistic functions are specified as in Koutchadé et al (2021).…”
Section: The Behaviour Of Agricultural Producersmentioning
confidence: 99%