2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2013.01.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling contribution behavior in fundraising: Segmentation analysis for a public broadcasting station

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
(40 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…, and derive transition probabilities among states for promotion and no-promotion actions. Transition probabilities are included in an N x N transition matrix, where Pik (i, k=1,2,,N) is the transition probability that a customer will move to state k in the next period given that currently he/she is in state i (Durango-Cohen, 2013), and calculated by the formula:…”
Section: Proposed Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…, and derive transition probabilities among states for promotion and no-promotion actions. Transition probabilities are included in an N x N transition matrix, where Pik (i, k=1,2,,N) is the transition probability that a customer will move to state k in the next period given that currently he/she is in state i (Durango-Cohen, 2013), and calculated by the formula:…”
Section: Proposed Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indicator aggregation creates risks when it obscures important information or trends, often when favorable variances in one area are offsetting unfavorable variances in another (Finkler et al, 2017). This includes behavioral variations within donor segments where behavioral characteristics might be multi‐modal within a segment or market (Durango‐Cohen, 2013; Durango‐Cohen et al, 2013). For example, newly acquired donors tend to have significantly different behavioral patterns than those who have made at least a second gift (Schmidt & Dougherty, 2019).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Out of the wide range of marketing and strategic management tools, the well-known segmentation-targeting-positioning (STP) approach is widely adopted, both in fundraising theory (Mindak & Bybee, 1971;Sargeant & Shang, 2010;Smith & Beik, 1982;Wind, 1978, etc. ) and practice (Berger & Smith, 1997;Durango-Cohen, 2013;McKinley-Floyd & Shrestha, 2008, etc.). Classical research demonstrated that, within the charity market, demographics, lifestyle, opinions and attitudes did not influence a particular type of nonprofit organisation (Schlegelmilch & Tynan, 1989).…”
Section: Previous Research Of Segmentation In Online Fundraising ('E-mentioning
confidence: 99%